Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 14;2010(4):CD001888. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub4

Comparison 2. Cell salvage ‐ blood transfused (washed versus unwashed).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 No. exposed to allogeneic blood (Cardiac) 31   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Washed 13 1158 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.66 [0.55, 0.80]
1.2 Unwashed 18 1360 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.76, 0.95]
2 No. exposed to allogeneic blood (Orthopaedic) 32   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Washed 10 800 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.48 [0.36, 0.64]
2.2 Unwashed 22 2357 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.47 [0.36, 0.63]
3 No. exposed to allogeneic blood (Vascular) 4   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 Washed 4 267 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.63 [0.34, 1.15]