Ekback 1995.
Methods | Patients with severe hip arthrosis undergoing total hip arthroplasty were studied to evaluate the efficacy of different peri‐operative blood saving techniques to reduce allogeneic blood transfusion. Method of randomisation and allocation concealment was not described. | |
Participants | 45 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were randomly allocated to one of three groups:
NB: Demographic data were not reported. |
|
Interventions |
Autotransfusion technique: Haemonetic Cell Saver 4, Althin model AT 1000, or Shiley/Dideco STAT were used. Blood was retrieved from the operation site by suction through a double lumen catheter and was then anticoagulated with heparin (30,000 IU heparin in 1000ml of physiological saline). The blood was collected into a reservoir where a macrofilter removed debris. Thereafter, the blood was pumped into a spinning centrifuge bowl (125ml of blood) and washed with 1500ml of physiological saline. The erythrocytes were concentrated to an EVF of about 50‐60% and pumped into an infusion bag. The effluent containing platelets, free haemoglobin and anticoagulants was disposed. |
|
Outcomes | Outcomes reported: amount of allogeneic blood transfused, amount of autologous blood transfused, number of patients transfused allogeneic blood, complications, adverse events. | |
Notes | Transfusion threshold: patients were transfused allogeneic blood to maintain the erythrocyte volume fraction (EVF) >27%. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method used to generate allocation sequences was not described. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method used to conceal treatment allocation was unclear. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk |