Page 1989.
Methods | Consecutive patients having elective coronary artery or valvular operations were enrolled in a prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing allogeneic blood consumption between conventional mediastinal drainage and reinfusion of shed mediastinal blood using a hard‐shell cardiotomy reservoir. Method of randomisation and allocation concealment was not described. | |
Participants | 100 consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary artery or valvular operations were randomly allocated to one of two groups:
|
|
Interventions |
NB: After bypass, any residual blood left in the perfusion circuit was saved and infused through a peripheral vein. Both groups of patients had pericardial and mediastinal drains (Axiom). A variety of both membrane and bubble oxygenators were used in both groups. |
|
Outcomes | Outcomes reported: amount of blood re‐transfused from the cell saver, amount of allogeneic blood transfused, number of patients transfused allogeneic blood, adverse events, re‐exploration for bleeding. | |
Notes | Transfusion threshold: allogeneic blood or hetastarch was infused to maintain cardiovascular stability and a haematocrit of 30%. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method used to generate allocation sequences was not described. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method used to conceal treatment allocation was unclear. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk |