Methods | RCT | |
Participants | People with at least one adenomatous polyp of the large bowel removed (USA) CVD risk: low Control: 1042 randomised, 947 analysed Intervention: 1037 randomised, 958 analysed Mean years in trial: control 3.05, intervention 3.05 % male: control 64%, intervention 66% Age: mean control 61.5, intervention 61.4 (all at least 35) |
|
Interventions | Low fat vs usual diet Control: general dietary guidelines Intervention: total fat 20%E, 18g fibre/1000kcal, 5-8 servings fruit and veg daily Control methods: leaflet, no additional information or behaviour modification Intervention methods: >50 hours of counselling over 4 years, included skill building, behaviour modification, self monitoring and nutritional materials Total fat intake (at 4 years): low fat 23.8 (sd 6.0), cont 33.9 (sd 5.9)%E Saturated fat intake: unclear Style: diet advice Setting: community |
|
Outcomes | Stated trial outcomes: recurrence of polyps, prostate cancer Data available on total mortality? yes Cardiovascular mortality? no Events available for combined cardiovascular events: none Secondary outcomes: cancer diagnoses Tertiary outcomes: weight, total cholesterol |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors’ judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | “randomly assigned” |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Phone call to computer randomisation centre, stratified according to centre |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes |
High risk | Outcome assessors blinded, participants not. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes |
Unclear risk | Unclear, deaths, cancer and CV events are drop-outs - unclear if any data missing |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Not relevant for primary and secondary outcomes as all trialists asked for data |
Other bias | Low risk | |
Free of systematic difference in care? | High risk | 50 hours behaviour modification in intervention group, not in control. See Control and Intervention Methods in Interventions section of the Table of Characteristics of Included Studies |
Free of dietary differences other than fat? | High risk | Fibre, fruit and vegetable goals in intervention group |