Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6;(7):CD002137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002137.pub2
Methods RCT
Participants People with at least one adenomatous polyp of the large bowel removed (USA)
CVD risk: low
Control: 1042 randomised, 947 analysed
Intervention: 1037 randomised, 958 analysed
Mean years in trial: control 3.05, intervention 3.05
% male: control 64%, intervention 66%
Age: mean control 61.5, intervention 61.4 (all at least 35)
Interventions Low fat vs usual diet
Control: general dietary guidelines
Intervention: total fat 20%E, 18g fibre/1000kcal, 5-8 servings fruit and veg daily
Control methods: leaflet, no additional information or behaviour modification
Intervention methods: >50 hours of counselling over 4 years, included skill building, behaviour modification, self monitoring and nutritional materials
Total fat intake (at 4 years): low fat 23.8 (sd 6.0), cont 33.9 (sd 5.9)%E
Saturated fat intake: unclear
Style: diet advice
Setting: community
Outcomes Stated trial outcomes: recurrence of polyps, prostate cancer
Data available on total mortality? yes
Cardiovascular mortality? no
Events available for combined cardiovascular events: none
Secondary outcomes: cancer diagnoses
Tertiary outcomes: weight, total cholesterol
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors’ judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk “randomly assigned”
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Phone call to computer randomisation centre, stratified according to centre
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes
High risk Outcome assessors blinded, participants not.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes
Unclear risk Unclear, deaths, cancer and CV events are drop-outs - unclear if any data missing
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Not relevant for primary and secondary outcomes as all trialists asked for data
Other bias Low risk
Free of systematic difference in care? High risk 50 hours behaviour modification in intervention group, not in control. See Control and Intervention Methods in Interventions section of the Table of Characteristics of Included Studies
Free of dietary differences other than fat? High risk Fibre, fruit and vegetable goals in intervention group