Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6;(7):CD002137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002137.pub2
Methods RCT
Participants Women with mammographic dysplasia (Canada)
CVD risk: low
Control: 147 randomised, 110 analysed at over 8 years
Intervention: 148 randomised, 104 analysed at over 8 years
Mean years in trial: control 7.5, intervention 6.8
% male: 0
Age: mean control 45, intervention 44 (all >30)
Interventions Reduced fat intake vs usual diet
Control aims: healthy diet advice, no alteration in dietary fat advised, aim to maintain weight
Intervention aims: total fat 15%E, replace fat by complex CHO, aim to maintain weight
Control methods: seen for advice once every 4 months for 12 months
Intervention methods: seen for advice once a month for 12 months
Total fat intake (at 9.2 years): low fat 31.7 (sd 7.3)%E, cont 35.3 (sd 5.6)%E
Saturated fat intake (at 9.2 years): low fat 10.6 (sd 4.6), cont 12.3 (sd 4.6)%E
Style: diet advice
Setting: community
Outcomes Stated trial outcomes: dietary fat, serum cholesterol
Data available on total mortality? yes, but not clear from which groups
Cardiovascular mortality? no
Events available for combined cardiovascular events: none
Secondary outcomes: none
Tertiary outcomes: weight, BMI, total and HDL cholesterol
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors’ judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk “randomly allocated”
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes
High risk Participants not blinded, but outcome assessors blinded to intervention
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes
Unclear risk Unclear, deaths, cancer and CV events are drop-outs, trialists asked for data - unclear if any data missing
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Not relevant for primary and secondary outcomes as all trialists asked for data
Other bias Low risk
Free of systematic difference in care? High risk Minor, women in intervention group seen more frequently. See Control and Intervention Methods in Interventions section of the Table of Characteristics of Included Studies
Free of dietary differences other than fat? Low risk See Control and Intervention Aims in Interventions section of the Table of Characteristics of Included Studies