Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003934. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003934.pub2
Methods Randomised trial. Randomised in blocks.
Participants Women recruited from a hospital in Southern Thailand. (2 groups used in this analysis (n = 83))
Inclusion criteria - married, primiparous women aged 18 - 35 years and in latent phase for > 10 hours. Singleton fetus, cephalic presentation, gestation 38 - 42 weeks, fetal weight 2500 - 4000 g
Exclusion criteria - had analgesia before recruitment, induced labour, membrane rupture > 20 hours previously, psychiatric problem, infection, asthma or objection to intervention
Interventions 5 separate intervention groups (described below). In this review we have included data from two groups:
Intervention group - CAT position alternating half hourly with head high position (CAT position = facing towards bed head at 45 degrees with knees bent, taking weight on knees and elbows; head high position = lying at a 45-degree angle) (n = 40)
Comparison group - supine in bed (n = 43).
Outcomes Duration of first stage.
Pain.
Notes Complicated study design with five study groups:
1. CAT position alternating with head-high position with music (n = 40).
2. CAT position alternating with head-high position (n = 40).
3. CAT position alternating with supine position (n = 40).
4. Head-high position (lying in bed on back at 45 degrees) (n = 41).
5. Supine in bed (n = 43).
In this review we have used data for groups 2 and 5 in the analyses (It was not clear what ‘CAT’ signified)
Risk of bias
Item Authors’ judgement Description
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear No information.
Allocation concealment? Unclear Described as ‘random assignments’.
Blinding?
Women
No Not feasible.
Blinding?
Clinical staff
No
Blinding?
Outcome assessor
No
Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes
Yes Three women were lost to follow up as they had caesarean sections during the first stage of labour. It was not clear whether this was before randomisation. No other loss to follow up was apparent