Table 3.
Comparison of PathoScope 2.0 against alternatives with ELISA negative fecal samples
| |
STEC Genome/Plasmid Rank (Plasmid Rank) |
Computation time (h:min) |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample ID |
PathoScope 2.0 |
PathoScope 1.0 |
ReadScan |
RINS |
PathoScope 2.0 | PathoScope 1.0 | ReadScan | RINS | ||
| Rank | Proportion | Rank | Proportion | Rank (Plasmid) | Rank | |||||
| 1253 |
3 |
1.4% |
8 |
0.3% |
33 (2) |
38 |
0:03 |
0:03 |
0:41 |
18:10 |
| 4961 |
7 |
0.3% |
6 |
0.6% |
40 (11) |
38 |
1:16 |
0:59 |
1:09:37 |
23:58:39 |
| 1122 |
14 |
0.0% |
2 |
7.3% |
24 (1) |
38 |
0:00 |
0:00 |
0:21:43 |
|
| 1196 |
NI |
0.0% |
2 |
3.0% |
38 (1) |
7 |
0:13 |
0:11 |
2:45:37 |
4:19:29 |
| 4096 |
25 |
0.0% |
8 |
0.6% |
70 (6) |
14 |
0:07 |
0:06 |
0:29:09 |
0:06:00 |
| 1196b |
4 |
0.8% |
3 |
3.1% |
31 (29) |
9 |
0:04 |
0:04 |
1:27:27 |
7:03:26 |
| 4961b |
8 |
0.2% |
4 |
0.5% |
35 (16) |
39 |
0:15 |
0:12 |
0:30:49 |
21:30:20 |
| 1122b |
15 |
0.0% |
2 |
6.6% |
26 (2) |
38 |
0:03 |
0:02 |
0:17:41 |
5:32:59 |
| 4096b | 22 | 0.0% | 8 | 0.4% | 76 (7) | 36 | 0:01 | 0:01 | 0:14:37 | 0:18:45 |
NI: the STEC O104:H4 genome was not identified by the method.
These are the results from the O104:H4 study - Negative Samples. See the section titled ‘Evaluation and comparison on clinical sequencing samples’ for details.