Banait 2000.
| Methods | Design: RCT (Practice randomised 2 arm trial) Randomisation concealment: DONE (but see note) Follow up: Providers: DONE Patients: NOT CLEAR Blinded assessment: DONE/NOT CLEAR Baseline: DONE/NOT CLEAR Reliable outcomes: DONE/NOT CLEAR Protection against contamination: DONE | |
| Participants | UK General practitioners in 114 general practices in Salford and Trafford Health Authority. Proportion of eligible providers who participated: 99.1% (114/115 practices) 33/57 (58%) of intervention practices received the intervention. Clinical area of interest: dyspepsia |
|
| Interventions | (1) Consultant led educational seminars plus paper copies of guidelines. Reinforcement practice visit at 3 months. (2) Paper copies of guidelines |
|
| Outcomes | Process: Appropriateness of referral for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy Findings at endoscopy Prescribing costs for acid suppressing drugs Requests for laboratory tests for Helicobacter Pylori |
|
| Notes | EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTION Allocation used minimisation based on practice size, fundholding status, previous expenditure on NSAIDs and previous involvement in a guideline initiative. |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Allocation concealment? | Low risk | A ‐ Adequate |