Table 4. Performance of various scoring functions in predicting the quality of the model on CASP10 targets for a blind test.

	RFMQA	dDFIRE	GOAP	DFIRE	RWplus	OPUS
CCTM	0.984	0.967	0.971	0.956	0.782	0.954
	0.985	0.964	0.966	0.964	0.960	0.966
Average TMloss	0.038	0.052	0.048	0.057	0.052	0.061
CCRank	0.395	0.403	0.365	0.378	0.357	0.323

Note: The first, the second and the third rows respectively represents the correlation coefficient (CC_TM), Spearman's correlation coefficient () and the average TM-score loss (TM_loss) between TM_method (TM-score of the model selected by a QA method) and TM_best (TM-score of the most native-like structure among decoys). The final row represents the average correlation coefficient between the predicted ranking and the actual ranking (CC_Rank) of 95 CASP10 targets. Bold fonts denote the best result.