Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 9;8(9-10):E610–E614. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2036

Table 2.

Pre-treatment and 6 months findings of the patients treated with HA-CS and HA

HA-CS HA HA-CS vs HA

Initial visit 6 months p value Initial visit 6 months p value p value
VAS 8.2 ± 2.09 4.9 ± 2.08 0.000 8 ± 2.88 4.5 ± 2.52 0.000 0.761
Frequency: mean ± SD 15.1 ± 7.03 12 ± 4.51 0.002 14.8 ± 6.47 11.8 ± 4.52 0.010 0.698
Nocturia: mean ± SD 3.1 ± 2.40 1.4 ± 1.28 0.001 3.1 ± 2.55 1.3 ± 1.32 0.002 0.861
ICSI 15.2 ± 3.57 11.4 ± 4.46 0.001 15.2 ± 3.95 11.1 ± 4.77 0.003 0.891
ICPI 13.2 ± 2.52 8.4 ± 4.45 0.000 13.3 ± 2.70 8.9 ± 4.35 0.000 0.665
Cystometric capacity (mL), mean ± SD 301.6 ± 121.92 322.5 ± 126.78 0.130 286.2 ± 127.24 322.4 ± 119.12 0.135 0.973
Voided volume (mL), mean ± SD 154.6 ± 94.17 173.7 ± 86.10 0.059 151 ± 90.59 164.9 ±80.22 0.555 0.473

Results of the 2 different therapies compared in the last column. HA: hyaluronic acid; CS: chondroitin sulphate; VAS: visual analog pain scale; ICSI: interstitial cystitis symptom index; ICPI: interstitial cystitis problem index; PST: potassium sensitivity test; SD: standard deviation; SD: standard deviation.