Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Mar 15;117:60–70. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2014.03.002

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Relationships between risk subgroup and set shifting performance. Neither trials to criterion on the initial discrimination (A) nor set shift (B) were significantly different between the subgroups. However, the risk averse subgroup committed significantly more previously-reinforced errors than the risk taking subgroup (C). There was no relationship with never-reinforced errors (D). Data represent means +/− SEM. *p<0.05