. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 24.

Published in final edited form as: Augment Altern Commun. 2014 Feb 24;30(1):71–82. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2014.880190

Table 4.

Pearson Correlations with DAPA-AP Total Score

Statistic	LSK	SM	Elision	BW	RLN^a	WID	WA
Full sample (n = 17)
r	.80	.79	.47	.63	–.46	.66	.44
p	.00	.00	.06	.01	.09	.00	.08
95% CI	[.64, .94]	[.56, .91]	[.31, .68]	[.45, .81]	[–.82, –.03]	[.51, .82]	[.30, .62]

> 5 on WA excluded (n = 11)
r	.73	.74	.46	.57	–.27	.68	.47
p	.01	.01	.16	.07	.46	.02	.15
95% CI	[.31, .95]	[.38, .97]	[.13, .79]	[.12, .89]	[–.96, .43]	[.45, .90]	[.27, .82]

Note. LSK = letter sound knowledge; SM = sound matching; BW = blending words; RLN = rapid letter naming; WID = word identification; WA = word attack.

Calculations are based on n = 15 for the full sample and n = 9 for > 5 on WA excluded.