Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 30;14:638. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-638

Table 3.

Transcripts significantly up-regulated in metastasizing tumors in both cohorts

Non-metastatic vs metastatic tumors Lymph node metastasis vs non-metastatic tumors Non-metastatic vs metastatic tumors
(Riester et al.)
Transcript p-value FC p-value FC p-value FC
COL6A2 0.0397 1.0967 0.7515 0.1176 0.0461 1.7263
LMCD1 0.0248 1.1631 0.0036 1.7576 0.0196 1.7212
FZD1 0.0287 1.5193 0.0878 1.1318 0.0055 1.0648
MITF 0.0364 1.6083 0.4593 -0.3003 0.0164 1.0783
EDNRA 0.0051 1.6613 0.0181 1.0262 0.0177 1.4840
EBF1 0.0211 1.7592 0.0168 1.8477 0.0149 1.0386
TPST1 0.0199 1.7953 0.1975 0.8709 0.0318 1.1064
AEBP1 0.0242 2.2697 0.0077 1.6563 0.0072 3.0447
PALLD 0.0344 2.3131 0.1163 0.9763 0.0104 1.4558
GEM 0.0121 2.3136 0.0000 3.2533 0.0219 1.5247
PXDN 0.0044 3.1464 0.0042 1.8611 0.0356 1.9232
KITLG 0.0110 3.3621 0.0537 1.6857 0.0323 1.1616

FC = Log 2 fold change differences.

Bold indicates significant p-values when comparing lymph node metastasis and non-metastatic tumors.