Table 3.
Evaluating Impact of Survivorship Care Planning: Metrics for Success
| Metric |
|---|
| Survivor level |
| Improved (perceived) patient-physician communication |
| Improved understanding of needed follow-up tests, their purpose and timing, and who will conduct them |
| Better understanding of potential late effects of illness and what symptoms might be important to report |
| Better adherence to recommended follow-up activities; fewer requests for unnecessary tests |
| Improved ability to identify providers and resources to address persistent effects of cancer and its treatment |
| Decreased cancer-related morbidity |
| Improved health-related quality of life and function |
| Improved healthy lifestyle choices |
| Potentially improved overall survival |
| Clinician level |
| Improved (perceived) patient-physician communication |
| Improved physician-physician communication |
| Better ability to coordinate care |
| Improved knowledge about and ultimately standardization of follow-up care behaviors |
| Improved ability to monitor survivors' health and implement changes in care in response to new information about treatment exposures and follow-up needs |
| System level |
| Reduced duplication of services |
| Improved access to information necessary to guide follow-up care; less time spent searching for this |
| Enhanced quality of care delivery (eg, compliance with evolving quality standards) |
NOTE. Data adapted.36