Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 16.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;(4):CD007536. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007536.pub2

Comparison 2.

Sensitivity analysis: pre-pregnancy intervention versus routine care: including all women randomised and not lost to follow up (Lumley study, pregnancy outcomes)

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Became pregnant and had baby small-for-gestational age (< 10th percentile) 1 1013 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.33 [0.85, 2.10]
2 Became pregnant and had extremely preterm birth (less than 28 weeks) 1 1034 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 9.25 [0.50, 171.31]
3 Became pregnant and had preterm birth (less than 37 weeks) 1 1034 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.45 [0.79, 2.67]
4 Became pregnant and birthweight less than 2500 g 1 1034 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.84 [0.97, 3.50]
5 Became pregnant and baby had congenital anomaly 1 1039 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.57 [0.50, 13.20]