Skip to main content
. 2014 May 17;13(3):415–421. doi: 10.1007/s10689-014-9727-2

Table 2.

Association of polymorphic variants of CDH1 with the risk of NSCL/P

rs no. Allelesa MAFb Genotypes casesc Genotypes controlsc ptrend value pgenotypic value pallelic value ORdominant (95 % CI)d; p value ORrecessive (95 % CI)e; p value
rs16260 A/C 0.29 22/97/131 49/213/278 0.811 0.970 0.807 0.964 (0.714–1.301); 0.810 0.967 (0.571–1.638); 0.900
rs9929218 A/G 0.29 22/102/126 48/222/270 0.921 0.995 0.921 0.984 (0.729–1.328); 0.917 0.989 (0.583–1.678); 0.967
rs7186053 A/G 0.45 48/118/84 111/261/168 0.480 0.766 0.474 0.893 (0.648–1.229); 0.485 0.918 (0.630–1.340); 0.659
rs4783573 A/G 0.27 18/95/137 40/210/290 0.787 0.959 0.785 0.957 (0.708–1.293); 0.774 0.970 (0.544–1.728); 0.917
rs16958383 A/G 0.19 8/78/164 23/155/362 0.930 0.637 0.929 1.066 (0.777–1.464); 0.690 0.743 (0.328–1.686); 0.476
rs1801552 C/ T 0.36 18/125/107 75/240/225 0.126 0.021 0.129 0.955 (0.705–1.293); 0.764 0.481 (0.281–0.824); 0.007

Statistically significant results are highlighted in bold (p < 0.00833—Bonferroni correction)

aUnderline denotes the minor allele in the control samples

b MAF minor allele frequency calculated from the control samples

cThe order of genotypes: dd/Dd/DD (d is the minor allele in the control samples)

dDominant model: dd + Dd versus DD (d is the minor allele)

eRecessive model: dd versus Dd + DD (d is the minor allele)