Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD006529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006529.pub2

Comparison 1. Response at acute phase (6‐12 weeks).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Milnacipran vs TCAs 4 537 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.87 [0.59, 1.30]
1.1 Milnacipran vs Imipramine 3 430 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.71, 1.54]
1.2 Milancipran vs Clomipramine 1 107 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.45 [0.21, 0.98]
2 Milnacipran vs SSRIs 6 1028 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.11 [0.76, 1.64]
2.1 Milnacipran vs Fluvoxamine 1 113 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.76 [0.81, 3.83]
2.2 Milnacipran vs Fluoxetine 3 560 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.93 [0.55, 1.58]
2.3 Milnacipran vs Paroxetine 1 302 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.93 [0.59, 1.47]
2.4 Milnacipran vs Sertraline 1 53 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 3.83 [0.90, 16.26]