Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD006529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006529.pub2

Comparison 5. Remission at early phase (1‐4 weeks).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Milnacipran vs TCAs 6 802 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.56, 1.40]
1.1 Milnacipran vs Imipramine 3 462 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.03 [0.59, 1.79]
1.2 Milnacipran vs Clomipramine 1 107 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.11, 4.33]
1.3 Milnacipran vs Amitriptyline 2 233 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.62 [0.25, 1.54]
2 Milnacipran vs SSRIs 6 953 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.28 [0.77, 2.14]
2.1 Milnacipran vs Fluvoxamine 2 240 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.36 [0.52, 3.58]
2.2 Milnacipran vs Fluoxetine 2 370 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.72 [0.71, 4.17]
2.3 Milnacipran vs Paroxetine 2 343 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.95 [0.42, 2.17]
3 Milnacipran vs Heterocyclics 1 179 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.44 [0.57, 3.67]
3.1 Milnacipran vs Mianserin 1 179 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.44 [0.57, 3.67]