Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD006529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006529.pub2

Comparison 9. Total dropouts (any reason).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Milnacipran vs TCAs 6 795 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.62, 1.33]
1.1 Milnacipran vs Imipramine 4 562 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.88 [0.52, 1.48]
1.2 Milnacipran vs Amitriptyline 2 233 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.47, 1.97]
2 Milnacipran vs SSRIs 8 1196 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.74, 1.26]
2.1 Milancipran vs Fluvoxamine 2 240 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.42, 1.54]
2.2 Milancipran vs Fluoxetine 3 560 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.02 [0.71, 1.46]
2.3 Milnacipran vs Paroxetine 2 343 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.49, 1.48]
2.4 Milancipran vs Sertraline 1 53 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.70 [0.57, 5.05]
3 Milnacipran vs Heterocyclics 1 179 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.57, 1.87]
3.1 Milacipran vs Mianserin 1 179 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.57, 1.87]