Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD006529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006529.pub2

Comparison 11. Dropouts due to adverse events.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Milnacipran vs TCAs 6 756 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.55 [0.35, 0.85]
1.1 Milnacipran vs Imipramine 4 562 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.60 [0.35, 1.04]
1.2 Milnacipran vs Clomipramine 1 107 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.43 [0.18, 1.03]
1.3 Milnacipran vs Amitriptyline 1 87 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.56 [0.12, 2.49]
2 Milnacipran vs SSRIs 7 1143 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.48, 1.04]
2.1 Milnacipran vs Fluvoxamine 2 240 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.51 [0.17, 1.47]
2.2 Milnacipran vs Fluoxetine 3 560 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.70 [0.41, 1.19]
2.3 Milancipran vs Paroxetine 2 343 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.82 [0.42, 1.62]
3 Milnacipran vs Heterocyclics 1 179 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.78 [0.33, 1.87]
3.1 Milnacipran vs Mianserin 1 179 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.78 [0.33, 1.87]