Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD006529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006529.pub2

Comparison 18. Adverse events: Hypotention.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Milnacipran vs TCAs 5 656 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.48 [0.16, 1.45]
1.1 Milancipran vs Imipramine 3 462 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.17 [0.04, 0.76]
1.2 Milnacipran vs Clomipramine 1 107 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.64 [0.74, 3.62]
1.3 Milnacipran vs Amitriptyline 1 87 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.41 [0.14, 1.21]
2 Milancipran vs SSRIs 4 687 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.50 [0.73, 3.08]
2.1 Milnacipran vs Fluvoxamine 1 127 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.42 [0.57, 3.53]
2.2 Milnacipran vs Fluoxetine 3 560 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.51 [0.38, 5.95]
3 Milnacipran vs Heterocyclics 1 179 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 3.43 [0.14, 85.37]
3.1 Milancipran vs Mianserin 1 179 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 3.43 [0.14, 85.37]