Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD006529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006529.pub2

Annseau 1989a.

Methods 4 week randomised double blind study.
Participants Diagnosis: Inpatients with RDC major depressive disorder
Male and Female.
Threshold of baseline severity: MADRS>=25, CGI<=4, Raskin Scale for Depression>Covi Anxiety Scale
 Total number of all allocated participants: N=146
 Age: mean 48.6 (SD 10.8) y, range 20‐70y.
Interventions Milnacipran 50/100mg: N=97 (50mg: N=47, 100mg: N=48)
 Amitriptyline 150mg: N=49
Fixed dosing schedule
Outcomes Hamilton Depression Rating Scale‐24 item, MADRS,CGI‐I, CGI‐S
Notes Funding: by industry
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "randomly assigned". Probably done.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "double‐blind". Probably done.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No missing primary outcome data.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Did not provide number of participants who dropped out during the study due to side effects.
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to assess whether an important risk of bias exists.