Endo 1995.
Methods | 4 week randomised double blind study | |
Participants | Diagnosis: In‐ and Out‐patients with DSM‐III‐R major depressive episode Male and Female. Threshold of baseline severity: Not reported. Total number of all allocated participants: N=179 Age: range 20‐65y |
|
Interventions | Milnacipran 50‐150mg (mean: 68.6mg): N=84
Mianserine 30‐ 60mg : N=95 Flexible dosing schedule. |
|
Outcomes | Hamilton Depression Rating Scale‐21 item, CGI‐I, CPRG | |
Notes | Funding: by industry Article in Japanese. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "randomised". Probably done. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Central allocation used. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "double‐blind" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No missing primary outcome data. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The study protocol is not available but it is clear that the published reports include all expected outcomes, including those that were pre‐specified. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to assess whether an important risk of bias exists. |