Lee 2002b.
Methods | 6 week randomised open‐label study | |
Participants | Diagnosis: Outpatients with DSM‐IV major depressive disorder Male and Female. Threshold of baseline severity: HDRS‐17>=17, MADRS>=21 Total number of all allocated participants: N=70 Age: mean 49 (SD 15)y for milnacipran , mean 51 (SD 12)y for fluoxetine; range 17‐70y |
|
Interventions | Milnacipran 100mg: N=39
Fluoxetine 20mg: N=31 Fixed dosing schedule. |
|
Outcomes | Hamilton Depression Rating Scale‐17 item, MADRS, CGI‐I, Covi Anxiety Scale | |
Notes | Funding: by industry Article in Korean. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "randomised". Probably done. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label study |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No missing primary outcome data. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to assess whether an important risk of bias exists. |