Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD006529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006529.pub2

Lee 2002b.

Methods 6 week randomised open‐label study
Participants Diagnosis: Outpatients with DSM‐IV major depressive disorder
Male and Female.
Threshold of baseline severity: HDRS‐17>=17, MADRS>=21
 Total number of all allocated participants: N=70
 Age: mean 49 (SD 15)y for milnacipran , mean 51 (SD 12)y for fluoxetine; range 17‐70y
Interventions Milnacipran 100mg: N=39
 Fluoxetine 20mg: N=31
Fixed dosing schedule.
Outcomes Hamilton Depression Rating Scale‐17 item, MADRS, CGI‐I, Covi Anxiety Scale
Notes Funding: by industry
Article in Korean.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "randomised". Probably done.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Open‐label study
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No missing primary outcome data.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information.
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to assess whether an important risk of bias exists.