Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD006529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006529.pub2

Leinonen 1997.

Methods 26 week randomised double blind study
Participants Diagnosis: In‐ and Out‐patients with DSM‐III‐R major depressive episode
Male and Female.
Threshold of baseline severity: HDRS‐17>=18, CGI>=moderately ill
 Total number of all allocated participants: N=107
 Age: mean 49.2 (SD 9.8)y for milnacipran, mean 47.1 (SD 10.6)y for clomipramine; range 18‐70y
Interventions Milnacipran 100‐200mg: N=52
 Clomipramine 75‐150mg: N=55
Flexible dosing schedule.
Outcomes Hamilton Depression Rating Scale‐17 item, MADRS, CGI‐S
Notes Funding: by industry
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "randomised". Probably done.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "double‐blind"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No missing primary outcome.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Number of participants who dropped out the trial is missing.
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to assess whether an important risk of bias exists.