Leinonen 1997.
Methods | 26 week randomised double blind study | |
Participants | Diagnosis: In‐ and Out‐patients with DSM‐III‐R major depressive episode Male and Female. Threshold of baseline severity: HDRS‐17>=18, CGI>=moderately ill Total number of all allocated participants: N=107 Age: mean 49.2 (SD 9.8)y for milnacipran, mean 47.1 (SD 10.6)y for clomipramine; range 18‐70y |
|
Interventions | Milnacipran 100‐200mg: N=52
Clomipramine 75‐150mg: N=55 Flexible dosing schedule. |
|
Outcomes | Hamilton Depression Rating Scale‐17 item, MADRS, CGI‐S | |
Notes | Funding: by industry | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "randomised". Probably done. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "double‐blind" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No missing primary outcome. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Number of participants who dropped out the trial is missing. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to assess whether an important risk of bias exists. |