Sechter 2000.
Methods | 6 week randomised double blind study | |
Participants | Diagnosis: Outpatients with DSM‐IV major depressive disorder Male and Female. Threshold of baseline severity: MADRS>=20 Total number of all allocated participants: N=302 Age: mean 44.8 (SD 11.6)y for milnacipran, mean 42.8 (SD 11.2)y for paroxetine; range 18‐70y |
|
Interventions | Milnacipran 100mg: N=149
Imipramine 20mg: N=153 Fixed dosing schedule. |
|
Outcomes | Hamilton Depression Rating Scale‐17 item, MADRS, CGI‐I, CGI‐S | |
Notes | Funding: by industry | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "randomised" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "double‐blind" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No missing primary outcome. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Missing standard deviations. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to assess whether an important risk of bias exists. |