Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD006529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006529.pub2

Sechter 2000.

Methods 6 week randomised double blind study
Participants Diagnosis: Outpatients with DSM‐IV major depressive disorder
Male and Female.
Threshold of baseline severity: MADRS>=20
 Total number of all allocated participants: N=302
 Age: mean 44.8 (SD 11.6)y for milnacipran, mean 42.8 (SD 11.2)y for paroxetine; range 18‐70y
Interventions Milnacipran 100mg: N=149
 Imipramine 20mg: N=153
Fixed dosing schedule.
Outcomes Hamilton Depression Rating Scale‐17 item, MADRS, CGI‐I, CGI‐S
Notes Funding: by industry
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "randomised"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "double‐blind"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No missing primary outcome.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Missing standard deviations.
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to assess whether an important risk of bias exists.