Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD006529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006529.pub2

Shinkai 2004.

Methods 4 week randomised double blind study
Participants Diagnosis: Inpatients with DSM‐IV major depressive disorder without psychotic features
Male and Female.
Threshold of baseline severity: HDRS‐17>=15
 Total number of all allocated participants: N=41
 Age: mean 53 (SD 17)y; range 20‐78y
Interventions Milnacipran mean 80.25mg: N=20
 Paroxetine mean 34.28mg: N=21
Flexible dosing schedule.
Outcomes Hamilton Depression Rating Scale‐17 item
Notes Funding: independent from industry
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "randomly"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "randomly divided into either milnacipran or the paroxetine group using StatView, a computerized statistical package"
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information provided.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No missing primary outcome.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Adverse events were not reported so that could not be entered in to the meta‐analysis.
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to assess whether an important risk of bias exists.