Shinkai 2004.
Methods | 4 week randomised double blind study | |
Participants | Diagnosis: Inpatients with DSM‐IV major depressive disorder without psychotic features Male and Female. Threshold of baseline severity: HDRS‐17>=15 Total number of all allocated participants: N=41 Age: mean 53 (SD 17)y; range 20‐78y |
|
Interventions | Milnacipran mean 80.25mg: N=20
Paroxetine mean 34.28mg: N=21 Flexible dosing schedule. |
|
Outcomes | Hamilton Depression Rating Scale‐17 item | |
Notes | Funding: independent from industry | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "randomly" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "randomly divided into either milnacipran or the paroxetine group using StatView, a computerized statistical package" |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information provided. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No missing primary outcome. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Adverse events were not reported so that could not be entered in to the meta‐analysis. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to assess whether an important risk of bias exists. |