Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct;20(4):271–280. doi: 10.1179/2049396714Y.0000000076

Table 4. Job strain and effort–reward imbalance scales.

Author (year) Scale items Measurement technique
Job strain
Eller and Netterstrom (2007) 2 items for demand, 12 items for control, 4 items for support Each dimension analyzed independently
Fujishiro et al. (2011) 5 items for demand, 9 items for job control Categorized into high strain, low strain, and active and passive groups following trichotomization of the demands and control scales
Hintsa et al. (2008) 3 items for work demand from the Occupational Stress Questionnaire, 9 items for control from the Job Content Questionnaire A continuous indicated calculated by subtracting the demands from control
Hintsanen et al. (2008) 3 items for work demand from the Occupational Stress Questionnaire, 9 items for control from the Job Content Questionnaire Job strain obtained by division of the mean score of the job demands and control sub scales
Kamarck et al. (2012) 5 items for job demand, job latitude composed of 6 item skill discretion and three item decision authority Task demand and control analyzed separately
Rosvall et al. (2002) 5 items for demand, 6 items for decision latitude Scores dichotamized at the median to form job strain, active, passive, and relaxed jobs
Effort–reward imbalance
Eller and Netterstrom (2007) 5 items for effort, 10 items for reward, 6 items for overcommitment ERI calculated as effort/reward × (5/10)
Xu et al. (2010) 6 items for effort, 11 items for reward, 6 items for overcommitment ERI calculated as 11× effort/(6 × reward)