Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 16.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD004749. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004749.pub2

Table 1.

Summary of Results

Study Outcome
Gulmezoglu 2007 Objective measures of behavior change: Location Intervention Rate change Control Rate change Difference in adjusted end of study rate (I-C)* P
Social support during labour Mexico −2.5 −1.0 0.1 0.58
Thailand 18.4 5.9 18.2 0.15
MgSO4 for eclampsia Mexico 26.5 11.1 3.8 0.88
Thailand −26.5 17.1 −11.2 0.58
Corticosteroids at < 34 weeks Mexico 7.9 4.0 5.3 0.64
Thailand 4.4 6.5 3.8 0.63
Selective episiotomy Mexico −5.7 −5.6 3.2 0.49
Thailand 4.2 −1.2 5.3 0.05
Antibiotic use for C-section Mexico 14.5 2.4 19.0 0.12
Thailand 9.8 13.9 4.6 0.66
Vacuum extraction delivery Mexico −0.4 −0.3 0.1 0.37
Thailand 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.95
Measures of knowledge change Location Timepoint Intervention Control
Knowledge of RHL Mexico Baseline 24.8% (78/314) 33.5% (65/195)
Endpoint 65.5% (210/307) 39.2% (62/158)
Thailand Baseline 33.9% (57/168) 38.2% (58/152)
Endpoint 83.3% (120/144) NR
Proportion of staff using RHL once a month Mexico Baseline 4.8% 7.2%
Endpoint 34.9% 12.7%
Thailand Baseline 15.5% NR
Endpoint 76.4% NR
Jousimaa 2002 Objective measures of behavior change: Intervention (%: n guideline compliant consultations/n relevant consultations) Control (%: n guideline compliant consultations/n relevant consultations) Odds Ratio (95% CI) ICC
Laboratory examinations 90.3% (1481/1640) 89.7% (1372/1529) 1.07 (0.79, 1.44) 0.015
Radiological examinations 93.8% (1504/1604) 93.3% (1416/1518) 1.09 (0.81, 1.46) 0
Physical examinations 92.8% (1494/1610) 94.6% (1461/1545) 0.74 (0.51, 1.06) 0.015
Other examinations 74.8% (235/314) 80.8% (248/307) 0.71 (0.43, 1.36) 0.021
Procedures 77.6% (152/196) 81.9% (140/171) 0.77 (0.43, 1.36) 0
Physiotherapy 78.6% (77/98) 80.6% (83/103) 0.88 (0.34, 2.32) 0.195
Nonpharmacologic treatment 87.0% (80/92) 90.2% (110/122) 0.73 (0.22, 2.41) 0.058
Pharmacological treatment 84.1% (1391/1654) 86.1% (1350/1568) 0.85 (0.67, 1.09) 0.010
Referrals 96.1% (1619/1684) 95.6% (1508/1578) 1.13 (0.79, 1.63) 0.002
*

The differences reported are differences in the adjusted end of study rates between the intervention and the control groups, not differences in rate changes.