Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
Alper 2005 | Intervention: no objective assessment of behavior change |
Bullard 2004 | Intervention: no objective assessment of behavior change |
Butzlaff 2004 | Intervention: only assessed knowledge outcomes/no EPOC outcomes |
Casebeer 2003 | Intervention: only assessed knowledge outcomes/no EPOC outcomes Study design: study is not complete (the initial results are based on knowledge test) |
D’Alessandro 2004 | Intervention: only assessed knowledge outcomes/no EPOC outcomes |
Deurenberg 2008 | Study design: semi-structured questionnaire |
Di 2003 | Population: not aimed at healthcare professionals in healthcare settings |
Dykes 2005 | Study design: historical control only (no other control group) and no randomization |
Elhadad 2005 | Intervention: only assessed knowledge outcomes/no EPOC outcomes |
Forsetlund 2003 | Participants: public health physicians were not involved in direct patient care |
Grad 2005 | Intervention: only assessed knowledge outcomes/no EPOC outcomes |
Gulmezoglu 1997 | Study design: editorial |
Haynes 2006 | Intervention: outcomes addressed use of service/no EPOC outcomes |
Kronick 2003 | Population: not aimed at healthcare professionals in healthcare settings |
Rudin 1996 | Study design: narrative article |
Rudin 1997 | Study design: narrative article |
Sintchenko 2004 | Study design: simulated cases |
Southard 2003 | Intervention: only assessed knowledge outcomes/no EPOC outcomes |
Stewart 2005 | Intervention: does include retrieval access to information |
Wyatt 1998 | Intervention: compared access to electronic materials as part of a multi-faceted intervention; however, there was no measure of information retrieval that could be used and there were issues of contamination in the control group. The final decision on the exclusion of this study was determined through arbitration |