Table 3.
Trials of adjuvant chemotherapy versus no further treatment
Study ID | Patients | Intervention | 5-year survival | Survival/statistics | Adverse effects | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICON1 2003 | 447 FIGO I-III 93% FIGO stage 1 | Immediate adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy versus treatment on progression | OS 79% (adjuvant arm) versus70% ( no treatment) | Hazard ratios OS: HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.97; P = 0.03 |
Not reported | Survival improvement with adjuvant therapy |
ACTION 2003 | 448 FIGO Ia-Ib grade II-III FIGO Ic-IIa FIGO I-IIa clear cell | Immediate adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy versus treatment on progression Cisplatin dose = 75 mg/m2 Carboplatin dose = 350 mg/m2 |
OS 85% (adjuvant arm) versus 78% (no treatment) | Hazard ratios OS: HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.44 to 1.08; P = 0.10 RFS: HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.92; P = 0.02 |
Not reported | Subgroup analysis showed that non-optimally staged patients in observation arm have significantly worse survival |
Trope 2000 | 162 highrisk stage I 36% patients had low-volume residual disease | Carboplatin 6 cycles Q28/7 AUC = 7 versus chemo at progression | No difference between arms DFS 70% versus 71%, OS 86% versus 85% | Log rank test DFS P = 0.41 OS P = 0.43 |
Hazard ratios DFS: HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.83 DSS: HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.37 to 2.36 |
Not reported |
Young 1990 | 48 treatment 44 observation |
Melphalan versus no further treat | DFS 91% versus 98% OS 94% versus 98% | Log rank test DFS P = 0.41 OS P = 0.43 |
Melphalan: 16% had severe myelosuppression. 26% had gastrointestinal side effects. One death: myeloproliferative disorder aplastic anaemia 6 years after completing treatment | Trial under powered to show any real differences |
Bolis 1995 | 85 FIGO (1976) I A-I B Grade 2 and 3 | Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 × 6 cycles Q28/7 versus no further treatment |
DFS 83% versus 64% OS 88% versus 82% | Hazard ratios DFS: HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.21 to 1.19; P = 0.17 OS: HR 1.20; 95% CI 0.46 to 3.1; P = 0.71 |
Nausea and vomiting in more than two-thirds of patients in cisplatin arm. Severe in less than 10%. Leucopenia 14%; thrombocytopenia 8%; neurological toxicity 6%; renal toxicity 7% | There were patients with residual disease in both arms |
CI = confidence interval; DFS = disease-free survival; OS = overall survival; RFS = recurrence-free survival; AUC = Area under the concentration curve