Smith 1999.
Methods | RCT. | |
Participants | 563 patients with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer Age at entry in the trial was as follows: <= 49 years: 197 (35%), >= 50 years: 366 (65%). There were 349 (62%) women with a normal performance status and 214 (38%) with a symptomatic status. Disease stage was as follows: IIIB: 92 (16%), IV: 471 (84%). |
|
Interventions | High dose single agent paclitaxel (250 mg/ m2). 3 versus 24 hour infusion. | |
Outcomes | Primary and overall tumour response, event‐free survival (progressive disease, relapse or death), survival, toxicity, compliance. | |
Notes | Patients receiving the longer duration infusion were given prophylactic G‐CSF in an attempt to reduce the risk of infection in patients with a low granulocyte count. Patients receiving the shorter infusion of paclitaxel only received G‐CSF if they had such an episode of infection. 176/278 women died in the 3 hour infusion group and 184/282 women died in the 24 hour infusion group. 241/278 women either had progressive disease, relapsed or died in the 3 hour infusion group compared to 251/282 women in the 24 hour infusion group. Median time to death was 21.1 months (18.2‐24.2 months) and 21.9 (19.6 to 23.6 months) months in the 3 hour and 24 hour infusion groups respectively. Median time to first event was 6.3 months (5.4‐7.4 months) and 7.2 (6.1 to 8.3 months) months in the 3 hour and 24 hour infusion groups respectively. None of these differences were statistically significant, even when adjusted for prognostic variables (survival P = 0.96 and event‐free survival P = 0.95). The primary tumour response rates were 41% for the three hour infusion and 51% for the 24 hour infusion (P = 0.03 and P = 0.02 when adjusted for significant factors in a logistic regression analysis). The figures for overall responses were 44% for the three hour infusion and 54% for the 24 hour infusion (unadjusted P value = 0.02 and adjusted P = 0.02). There were 11 deaths due to adverse events (10 in the first four cycles), a number of which were due to infection. Seven of these were in patients receiving the three hour infusion and four with the 24 hour infusion. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 3 hr infusion: 258/279 (92%) patients were assessable for primary tumour response, 261/279 (94%) patients for overall tumour response and 278/279 (99%) patients were assessed for progression‐free survival, overall survival and toxicity. 24 hr infusion: 255/284 (90%) patients were assessable for primary tumour response, 259/284 (91%) patients for overall tumour response and 282/284 (99%) patients were assessed for progression‐free and overall survival. 279/284 (98%) patients were assessed for toxicity. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to assess whether an important risk of bias exists |