Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD003916. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003916.pub4

Comparison 2. EBRT vs. No EBRT: Low risk women (IA/B and grade 1/2).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Death from all causes 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 EBRT vs. no additional treatment 1 260 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.03 [0.51, 2.08]
2 Endometrial carcinoma‐related deaths 2 517 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.64 [1.05, 6.66]
2.1 EBRT vs. no additional treatment 1 260 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.41 [0.64, 9.10]
2.2 EBRT vs. no additional treatment (VBT balanced across groups) 1 257 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.89 [0.80, 10.42]