Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD003916. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003916.pub4

Comparison 5. EBRT vs. No EBRT: Intermediate and high‐risk women.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Death from all causes 7 3373 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.81, 1.12]
1.1 Intermediate‐risk 7 2944 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.82, 1.18]
1.2 High‐risk 3 429 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.88 [0.63, 1.22]
2 Endometrial carcinoma‐related deaths 6 3250 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.76, 1.26]
2.1 Intermediate‐risk 6 2821 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.08 [0.77, 1.51]
2.2 High‐risk 3 429 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.54, 1.18]