. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 16.

Published in final edited form as: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2013;16(0 2):75–82. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40763-5_10

Table 2.

Statistics of average distance between the subjectively assessed optic cup and disc margins and the automatically detected margins by our algorithm (OUR), the active contour model (ACM) [4] and graph cut (GC) [8] from photos of 16 normal controls and 15 glaucoma subjects.

Mean±STD	Normal			Glaucoma
Mean±STD	OUR	ACM	GC	OUR	ACM	GC
Cup	^*8.2 ± 6.1	42.9 ± 28.5	31.3 ± 22.9	^*10.5 ± 7.7	55.6 ± 34.4	48.1 ± 29.6
Disc	^*14.5 ± 12.4	46.2 ± 20.0	50.7 ± 28.3	^*16.9 ± 12.8	60.8 ± 44.0	59.2 ± 30.7

indicates the best performance value.