Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Immunol. 2014 Jun 16;44(9):2703–2711. doi: 10.1002/eji.201344392

Fig. 3. TIM-3+ regulatory T cells suppress better than TIM-3 regulatory T cells.

Fig. 3

Regulatory (CD4+CD25highCD127low/—; Tregs) T cells were sorted by flow cytometry and activated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 for 3 days. After 3 days TIM-3+ and TIM-3 regulatory T cells were resorted by flow cytometry and responder (CD4+CD25low/— CD127+; Tresp) T cells were sorted in parallel. CFSE-labeled Tresp were cocultured with TIM-3+ or TIM-3 Tregs at different Tregs:Tresp ratios ranging from 1:2 to 1:8. At day 3, cells were collected, stained for viability and fixed. A. Proliferation of unstimulated (upper left panel) or stimulated (upper right panel) Tresp alone and Tresp and TIM-3+ or TIM-3 Treg co-cultures (lower panels left and right respectively), one representative experiment. B. Percentage of suppression as per the following formula: %suppression = [1-(Tresp in coculture / Tresp alone)] x 100. Statistical analyses of 3 independent experiments with two donors per experiment.