Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 26;43(6):745–758. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0492-0

Table 3.

Vilhelmina broad sector actor centrality scores

Sector (n) Positive interactions Neutral interactions Negative interactions
In-degreea Out-degree In-degree Out-degree In-degree Out-degree
Authorities (34) 0.069 0.037 0.106 0.164 0.048 0.048
Forestry (60) 0.043 0.099 0.031 0.395 0.031 0.049
Infrastructure (34) 0.037 0 0.069 0 0.011 0
Nature conservation (11) 0.009 0.043 0.047 0.038 0.019 0.024
Other (general)b (23) 0.035 0 0.070 0 0.025 0
Other (hydro, wind, mining, ag)b (12) 0.005 0 0.024 0 0.019 0
Reindeer husbandry (6) 0.051 0.046 0.051 0.078 0 0.101
Tourism (40) 0.016 0.099 0.038 0.093 0.016 0.016

aCentrality measures are based on binary data (aggregated to the broad sector of land user scale) and do not include self-ties

bSectors not represented by interviewees, but identified by respondents as impacting their land use