Table 3.
Sector (n) | Positive interactions | Neutral interactions | Negative interactions | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In-degreea | Out-degree | In-degree | Out-degree | In-degree | Out-degree | |
Authorities (34) | 0.069 | 0.037 | 0.106 | 0.164 | 0.048 | 0.048 |
Forestry (60) | 0.043 | 0.099 | 0.031 | 0.395 | 0.031 | 0.049 |
Infrastructure (34) | 0.037 | 0 | 0.069 | 0 | 0.011 | 0 |
Nature conservation (11) | 0.009 | 0.043 | 0.047 | 0.038 | 0.019 | 0.024 |
Other (general)b (23) | 0.035 | 0 | 0.070 | 0 | 0.025 | 0 |
Other (hydro, wind, mining, ag)b (12) | 0.005 | 0 | 0.024 | 0 | 0.019 | 0 |
Reindeer husbandry (6) | 0.051 | 0.046 | 0.051 | 0.078 | 0 | 0.101 |
Tourism (40) | 0.016 | 0.099 | 0.038 | 0.093 | 0.016 | 0.016 |
aCentrality measures are based on binary data (aggregated to the broad sector of land user scale) and do not include self-ties
bSectors not represented by interviewees, but identified by respondents as impacting their land use