Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 17.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Methods. 2011 Dec 18;9(2):159–172. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1808

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Relationship between off kinetics and light sensitivity of optogenetic tools. Summary plot (on a log-log scale) of the relationship between τoff versus EPD50 for all depolarizing tools from Figures 1 and 3, plus VChR1, SFO(C128S) and SSFO(C128S/D156A). Dashed line represents best fit regression with R2 = 0.83; Spearman correlation coefficient R = −0.93, P < 0.001. Values for SFO and SSFO were estimated from previous publications11,15 and did not contribute to the regression or correlation calculations.