Table 1.
A. Dependent Variables | Mean | S.D. | Min. | Max. | N | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Individual Economic Distress | 0.01 | 0.64 | − 1.66 | 1.77 | 917 | ||
Collective Economic Decline | 1.60 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 614 | ||
Personal Distress | − 0.01 | 0.74 | − 1.37 | 2.01 | 774 | ||
Interpersonal Distrust | − 0.01 | 0.76 | − 1.76 | 0.77 | 579 | ||
Distrust of Federal Government | − 0.01 | 0.78 | − 1.71 | 1.46 | 589 | ||
Stereotyping | − 0.01 | 0.59 | − 1.88 | 1.52 | 154 | ||
Views on Immigrants and Hispanic Immigration Flow | − 0.02 | 0.62 | − 1.35 | 1.49 | 173 | ||
Opposition to Intermarriage | 2.55 | 1.13 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 165 | ||
Cool Feelings Toward Hispanics | 3.46 | 2.38 | 1.00 | 9.00 | 364 | ||
B. Independent Variables | Mean | S.D. | Min. | Max. | N | ||
Age | 43.34 | 15.54 | 18.00 | 89.00 | 917 | ||
Gender (Male = 1) | 0.38 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 917 | ||
Education | 12.40 | 2.74 | 0.00 | 20.00 | 917 | ||
Occupational Prestige | 39.89 | 13.34 | 17.00 | 86.00 | 917 | ||
Work Status (Full-time = 1) | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 917 | ||
East | 0.19 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 917 | ||
Midwest | 0.21 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 917 | ||
South | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 917 | ||
West | 0.08 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 917 | ||
Locality Population Size (ln) | 14.15 | 1.92 | 9.68 | 16.79 | 917 | ||
Metropolitan Status (MSA = 1) | 0.83 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 917 | ||
2000 Black Population Share (ln) | − 1.75 | 0.73 | − 5.90 | − 0.56 | 917 | ||
2000 Proportion of Blacks with a High School Diploma | 0.72 | 0.08 | 0.51 | 0.96 | 917 | ||
2000 Hispanic Population Share (ln) | − 2.89 | 1.12 | − 5.00 | − 0.56 | 917 | ||
2000/1990 Hispanic Population Growth (ln) | 0.66 | 0.55 | 0.06 | 2.26 | 917 |
Note: Statistics for dependent variables are limited to cases for which valid data exists on all independent variables. Statistics for independent variables are limited to those cases for which valid data exists on all other independent variables and on the dependent variable with the largest N (Individual Economic Distress). Computing descriptive statistics for locality characteristics at the individual level produces summaries weighted by locality subsample size.