Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 18.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Res. 2010 May;39(3):491–505. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.01.003

Table 5.

Results of HLM Analyses of Opposition to Intermarriage and Cool Feelings Toward Hispanics

Opposition to
Intermarriage
Cool Feelings
Toward Hispanics


b S.E. b S.E.


Intercept 2.525*** 0.102 3.303*** 0.159
Individual-Level Controls
Age 0.004 0.006 0.002 0.008
Gender (Male = 1) 0.045 0.171 − 0.339 0.252
Education − 0.070 0.038 − 0.001 0.049
Occupational Prestige 0.010 0.007 − 0.008 0.010
Work Status (Full-time = 1) − 0.035 0.179 0.031 0.273
Locality-Level Controls
Region (Ref. = Northeast)
  Midwest − 0.285 0.287 0.047 0.428
  South 0.032 0.328 0.014 0.505
  West − 0.231 0.418 0.486 0.579
Locality Population Size (ln) − 0.010 0.118 0.013 0.175
Metropolitan Status (MSA = 1) 0.156 0.455 1.136 0.627
2000 Black Population Share (ln) 0.054 0.195 0.327 0.308
2000 Proportion of Blacks with a High School Diploma − 1.204 1.747 − 1.983 2.909
Local Hispanic Numbers
2000 Hispanic Population Share (ln) − 0.114 0.116 − 0.344* 0.170
2000/1990 Hispanic Population Growth (ln) 0.204 0.193 0.650* 0.271
Proportion of Variance Explained
  Individual Level 0.0891 0.0139
  Locality Level 0.9931 0.9888
Sample Size
  Individuals 165 364
  Localities 54 61

Note: Entries are unstandardized HLM coefficients with standard errors. All variables have been centered around their grand means.

p < .10;

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001 (two-tailed tests).