Table 5.
Opposition to Intermarriage |
Cool Feelings Toward Hispanics |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
b | S.E. | b | S.E. | |
Intercept | 2.525*** | 0.102 | 3.303*** | 0.159 |
Individual-Level Controls | ||||
Age | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.002 | 0.008 |
Gender (Male = 1) | 0.045 | 0.171 | − 0.339 | 0.252 |
Education | − 0.070† | 0.038 | − 0.001 | 0.049 |
Occupational Prestige | 0.010 | 0.007 | − 0.008 | 0.010 |
Work Status (Full-time = 1) | − 0.035 | 0.179 | 0.031 | 0.273 |
Locality-Level Controls | ||||
Region (Ref. = Northeast) | ||||
Midwest | − 0.285 | 0.287 | 0.047 | 0.428 |
South | 0.032 | 0.328 | 0.014 | 0.505 |
West | − 0.231 | 0.418 | 0.486 | 0.579 |
Locality Population Size (ln) | − 0.010 | 0.118 | 0.013 | 0.175 |
Metropolitan Status (MSA = 1) | 0.156 | 0.455 | 1.136† | 0.627 |
2000 Black Population Share (ln) | 0.054 | 0.195 | 0.327 | 0.308 |
2000 Proportion of Blacks with a High School Diploma | − 1.204 | 1.747 | − 1.983 | 2.909 |
Local Hispanic Numbers | ||||
2000 Hispanic Population Share (ln) | − 0.114 | 0.116 | − 0.344* | 0.170 |
2000/1990 Hispanic Population Growth (ln) | 0.204 | 0.193 | 0.650* | 0.271 |
Proportion of Variance Explained | ||||
Individual Level | 0.0891 | 0.0139 | ||
Locality Level | 0.9931 | 0.9888 | ||
Sample Size | ||||
Individuals | 165 | 364 | ||
Localities | 54 | 61 |
Note: Entries are unstandardized HLM coefficients with standard errors. All variables have been centered around their grand means.
p < .10;
p < .05;
p < .01;
p < .001 (two-tailed tests).