Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Vocat Behav. 2014 Oct 1;85(2):228–237. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2014.06.003

Table 4.

Regression Models using Goal Importance and Self-efficacy Beliefs at T1 and T2 to Predict Adulthood Outcomes

Perceived success in family life Perceived success in work life Job authority Educational level Do you have any children?

β β β β Exp (B)c

T1a T2b T1 T2 T1 T2 T1 T2 T1 T2
Work goal importance (WGI) .035 −.053 .042 −.016 −.069 −.049 .040 .094* .924 .940
Family goal importance (FGI) .080 .101 .044 −.079 −.056 .041 .136* .218** 1.033 1.364*
Work self-efficacy beliefs (WSB) −.072 .091* −.016 .043 −.031 −.016 −.047 −.039 .761* 1.120
Family self-efficacy beliefs (FSB) .110* .091 −.063 .126* .021 .165** −.067 −.030 1.478** 1.360*
WGI X WSB −.037 −.015 −.027 .131** .082 .040 −.071 .071 .898 1.154
WGI X FSB −.131* .072 −.024 .030 −.018 −.076 −.073 .028 .695 1.315
WGI X FGI .112* −.058 .118* .023 −.002 .105 −.039 .025 .970 .597*
FGI X WSB .064 −.046 −.114* −.123* .049 .007 −.098t −.025 1.184 .679*
FGI X FSB .036 .066 −.131** −.031 .036 −.061 .010 .129* 1.058 1.118
WSB X FSB −.056 .045 .092 −.017 .010 .075 .051 −.134* .884 1.265

Note.

a

Using T1 predictors.

b

Using T2 predictors. All variables were centered before being entered into the model.

c

Logistic regression was applied due to the binary feature of the dependent variable. Only 2-way interactions were added for simplicity sake.

t

p < .06,

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01