Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Signal. 2014 Jul 15;26(11):2521–2529. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.07.003

Table 2. Effect of fenoldopam and βCD on cAMP accumulation in LR and non-LR fractions.

Treatment cAMP acculmulation
(pmol/mg protein/min)
HEK-hDjR HEK-hD5R
Con-LRs 30.5±2.1 35.3 ±2.9
Fen-LRs 512.5 ±47.4*# 131.9±9.1*
βCD-LRs 19.7±1.0 23.4 ±3.4
βCD+Fen-LRs 185.3 ±9.8$ 40.3 ±3.6
Con-non-LRs 29.6 ±3.3 54.9 ±5.0&
Fen-non-LRs 50.0±5.1 88.7 ± 5.8**
βCD-non-LRs 25.4 ±2.0 67.1 ±8.3&
βCD+Fen-non-LRs 48.2 ±3.4 68.9 ± 5.3

Cell sucrose gradient fractions 2-6 and 7-12 were combined as LR (2-6) and non-LR (7-12) fractions. The amount of cAMP in each well was measured using cAMP assay kit. cAMP accumulation was calculated and corrected for total protein (mg/ml) and expressed as pmol/mg protein/min. Values are Mean ± SEM (n = 4/group).

*

P<0.001, vs. all others in HEK-hD1R and HEK-hD5R cells, respectively,

#

P<0.001, vs. HEK-hD5R,

$

P<0.001, vs. others HEK-hD1R, and βCD+Fen-LRs HEK-hD5R cells,

**

P<0.05, vs. all others except βCD+Fen-LRs HEK-hD5R cells, ANOVA, Tukey test,

&

P<0.006, vs. Con-non-LRs and βCD-non-LRs, HEK-hD1R, t-test.