Table 2. Effect of fenoldopam and βCD on cAMP accumulation in LR and non-LR fractions.
Treatment | cAMP acculmulation (pmol/mg protein/min) |
|
---|---|---|
HEK-hDjR | HEK-hD5R | |
Con-LRs | 30.5±2.1 | 35.3 ±2.9 |
Fen-LRs | 512.5 ±47.4*# | 131.9±9.1* |
βCD-LRs | 19.7±1.0 | 23.4 ±3.4 |
βCD+Fen-LRs | 185.3 ±9.8$ | 40.3 ±3.6 |
Con-non-LRs | 29.6 ±3.3 | 54.9 ±5.0& |
Fen-non-LRs | 50.0±5.1 | 88.7 ± 5.8** |
βCD-non-LRs | 25.4 ±2.0 | 67.1 ±8.3& |
βCD+Fen-non-LRs | 48.2 ±3.4 | 68.9 ± 5.3 |
Cell sucrose gradient fractions 2-6 and 7-12 were combined as LR (2-6) and non-LR (7-12) fractions. The amount of cAMP in each well was measured using cAMP assay kit. cAMP accumulation was calculated and corrected for total protein (mg/ml) and expressed as pmol/mg protein/min. Values are Mean ± SEM (n = 4/group).
P<0.001, vs. all others in HEK-hD1R and HEK-hD5R cells, respectively,
P<0.001, vs. HEK-hD5R,
P<0.001, vs. others HEK-hD1R, and βCD+Fen-LRs HEK-hD5R cells,
P<0.05, vs. all others except βCD+Fen-LRs HEK-hD5R cells, ANOVA, Tukey test,
P<0.006, vs. Con-non-LRs and βCD-non-LRs, HEK-hD1R, t-test.