Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Elder Abuse Negl. 2014;26(3):244–269. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2013.820656

TABLE 3.

Frequency of Thematic Codes on Five Dimensions of Elder Mistreatment by Type of Participant Response

Interviews
Focus groups
Experts and
professionals
(27–67 years
old)a
Chinese
seniors
(≥ 60
years old)a
Korean
seniors
(≥ 60
years old)b
Chinese
caregivers
(30–59
years old)a
Korean college
students
(20–29 years
old)b
All
participantsc
Psychological or emotional abuse
223 37 22 24 19 325
Neglect by a trusted person
129 41 18 17 22 227
Financial exploitation
122 20 3 6 5 156
Physical abuse
80 6 1 4 3 94
Sexual abuse
10 0 0 0 2 12

Note. In analyzing interview and focus group transcripts, investigators viewed each passage of participant speech as a separate unit of analysis. They assigned thematic codes to each passage based on their interpretation of content. A unit could have more than one code. Hierarchical codes (one included within another) were also used. The total number of times that each thematic code appeared in an interview or focus group discussion was computed. Thematic codes were broadly categorized into five dimensions of elder mistreatment: psychological or emotional abuse, neglect by a trusted person, financial exploitation, physical abuse, and sexual abuse.

a

n = 20.

b

n = 10.

c

N = 80.