TABLE 3.
Interviews |
Focus groups |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experts and professionals (27–67 years old)a |
Chinese seniors (≥ 60 years old)a |
Korean seniors (≥ 60 years old)b |
Chinese caregivers (30–59 years old)a |
Korean college students (20–29 years old)b |
All participantsc |
Psychological or emotional abuse | |||||
223 | 37 | 22 | 24 | 19 | 325 |
Neglect by a trusted person | |||||
129 | 41 | 18 | 17 | 22 | 227 |
Financial exploitation | |||||
122 | 20 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 156 |
Physical abuse | |||||
80 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 94 |
Sexual abuse | |||||
10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 |
Note. In analyzing interview and focus group transcripts, investigators viewed each passage of participant speech as a separate unit of analysis. They assigned thematic codes to each passage based on their interpretation of content. A unit could have more than one code. Hierarchical codes (one included within another) were also used. The total number of times that each thematic code appeared in an interview or focus group discussion was computed. Thematic codes were broadly categorized into five dimensions of elder mistreatment: psychological or emotional abuse, neglect by a trusted person, financial exploitation, physical abuse, and sexual abuse.
n = 20.
n = 10.
N = 80.