. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.

Published in final edited form as: Crit Care Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2225–2234. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000506

Table 2.

Comparison of Neurological Outcomes for nSR and SR Arrests and Discharge and Follow-up: Results are obtained from GEE analysis. The ‘nSR Only’ and ‘SR Only’ rows are obtained from the full models including an interaction term between time and rhythm. The ‘All’ row includes patients of both rhythms, and does not include an interaction term, given that the interaction term was not significant.

		OR (95% CI) for a Favorable Neurological Outcome Comparing FU vs DC Among Hospital Survivors

		Unadjusted	Adjusted^*

Rhythm	All (no interaction term)	2.5 (1.3-4.7)	2.9 (1.4-6.2)
	nSR Only	3.0 (0.7-13)	1.6 (0.4-6.7)
	SR Only	2.8 (1.2-6.3)	3.1 (1.4-7.1)

Adjusted for past history of diabetes, whether the event was witnessed, and whether the event received bystander CPR. The ‘All’ model is also adjusted for nSR vs SR.