Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscientist. 2014 Mar 17;21(2):203–215. doi: 10.1177/1073858414527541

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Spinal and supraspinal plasticity underlies H-reflex conditioning. The shaded ovals indicate the sites of plasticity associated with operant conditioning of the H-reflex. “MN” is the motoneuron, “CST” is the main corticospinal tract, “IN” is a spinal interneuron, and “GABA IN” is a GABAergic spinal interneuron. Dashed pathways imply the possibility of intervening spinal interneurons. The monosynaptic and probably oligosynaptic H-reflex pathway from groups Ia, II, and Ib afferents to the motoneuron is shown. Definite (dark green shade) or probable (light green shade) sites of plasticity include: the motoneuron membrane (i.e., firing threshold and axonal conduction velocity); motor unit properties; GABAergic interneurons; GABAergic terminals and C terminals on the motoneuron; the Ia afferent synaptic connection; terminals conveying oligosynaptic groups I and II inhibition or excitation to the motoneuron; sensorimotor cortex; and cerebellum. The latest data suggest that the reward contingency acts through the inferior olive to guide and maintain plasticity in the cerebellum that guides and maintains plasticity in sensorimotor cortex that (via the CST) guides and maintains plasticity in the spinal cord that is directly responsible for the H-reflex change. (From (Thompson and Wolpaw 2014b).)