Abstract
Cell loss after transplantation is a major limitation for cell replacement approaches in regenerative medicine. To assess the survival kinetics of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes (CM) we generated transgenic murine iPSC lines which, in addition to CM-specific expression of puromycin N-acetyl-transferase and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP), also constitutively express firefly luciferase (FLuc) for bioluminescence (BL) in vivo imaging. While undifferentiated iPSC lines generated by random integration of the transgene into the genome retained stable FLuc activity over many passages, the BL signal intensity was strongly decreased in purified iPS-CM compared to undifferentiated iPSC. Targeted integration of FLuc-expression cassette into the ROSA26 genomic locus using zinc finger nuclease (ZFN) technology strongly reduced transgene silencing in iPS-CM, leading to a several-fold higher BL compared to iPS-CM expressing FLuc from random genomic loci. To investigate the survival kinetics of iPS-CM in vivo, purified CM obtained from iPSC lines expressing FLuc from a random or the ROSA26 locus were transplanted into cryoinfarcted hearts of syngeneic mice. Engraftment of viable cells was monitored by BL imaging over 4 weeks. Transplanted iPS-CM were poorly retained in the myocardium independently of the cell line used. However, up to 8% of cells survived for 28 days at the site of injection, which was confirmed by immunohistological detection of EGFP-positive iPS-CM in the host tissue. Transplantation of iPS-CM did not affect the scar formation or capillary density in the periinfarct region of host myocardium. This report is the first to determine the survival kinetics of drug-selected iPS-CM in the infarcted heart using BL imaging and demonstrates that transgene silencing in the course of iPSC differentiation can be greatly reduced by employing genome editing technology. FLuc-expressing iPS-CM generated in this study will enable further studies to reduce their loss, increase long-term survival and functional integration upon transplantation.
Introduction
Heart failure is the most frequent cause of death in adults in developed countries [1]. Cellular replacement approaches hold great promise for the treatment of this disease. Embryonic stem cells (ESC) [2], [3], induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) [4], [5], parthenogenetic stem cells [6] and their cardiomyocyte (CM) derivatives [7]–[12], as well as cardiac precursor cells [13], [14] and autologous adult stem cells [15], [16], have been shown to exert beneficial effects on the function of the injured heart after transplantation. However, only contractile CM are capable of electromechanical coupling with the host heart tissue, thereby contributing to its pump function [9], [12], [17]. Among different types of stem cells, iPSC represent an attractive source of contractile CM for cardiac repair. These cells can be obtained from autologous sources, are ethically unobjectionable and similar to ESC-derived CM (ES-CM) in regard to their molecular [18], structural [19] and functional [20], [21] properties. Furthermore, like ES-CM, transplanted purified murine iPS-CM can also improve the contractile heart function following chronic myocardial infarction in animal models of this disease [11].
Despite great promises of cell-based therapeutic strategies for damaged heart, studies on integration efficiency and therapeutic benefit of cells transplanted into the myocardium have been greatly impeded by the loss of cells after cardiac delivery [22]–[28]. The most important factors responsible for this phenomenon are cell death due to ischemia and inflammation at the site of injection, mechanical loss of cells immediately after delivery and lack of functional coupling of transplanted cells with host CM [27]. In order to determine the number of cells successfully delivered into the site of injury and develop strategies for improving their engraftment and survival, approaches for quantitative in vivo monitoring of viable cells after transplantation are required. A number of methods such as quantitative PCR, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), radionuclide imaging (e.g. positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and reporter gene imaging (e.g. bioluminescence (BL) imaging) have been employed for this purpose (reviewed in [29]). BL imaging has been extensively used in preclinical models for longitudinal in vivo monitoring of various types of transplanted stem cells [16], [22], [23], [26], [30], [31]. Although this method requires the genetic modification of cells to express one of the luciferase enzymes, has a low spatial resolution and is not translational to humans, it enables affordable, highly sensitive, non-radioactive detection and quantification of viable cells in live small animals. BL imaging was applied by several groups to track the in vivo engraftment of ES-CM [22], [23], [31]. However, careful analysis of the survival kinetics of iPS-CM after transplantation into the infarcted heart of syngeneic recipients using BL imaging has not yet been performed.
In the present study, we established a transgenic iPSC line constitutively expressing firefly luciferase (FLuc) as well as the antibiotic resistance gene puromycin N-acetyl-transferase (PAC) and EGFP under control of the cardiac specific alpha-myosin heavy chain (αMHC) gene promoter allowing for isolation, visualization and in vivo tracking of purified iPS-CM. The expression of FLuc was driven by various constitutive promoters (Ubiquitin C, CAG) after random genomic integration of the transgene in iPSC. An additional ESC line in which FLuc expression was driven by the phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) promoter was also generated. All established cell lines exhibited stable FLuc activity in the course of in vitro expansion. However, upon initiation of differentiation strong silencing of FLuc expression was encountered in all cell lines independently of the promoter used. The transgene silencing was minimized by insertion of the UbC promoter-driven FLuc cassette into the ROSA26 safe harbor locus using zinc finger nuclease (ZFN)-based genome editing [32]. We selected one iPSC line generated by ZFN approach and one generated by random insertion of the transgene, in which pUbC-driven FLuc activity was high enough in purified CM to ensure their in vivo detection after transplantation into the periinfarct region of cryoinjured hearts of syngeneic recipients. Intramyocardially transplanted FLuc-ROSA iPS-CM exhibited four-fold higher BL signal intensity than iPS-CM expressing FLuc from random loci. However, in both iPSC lines the majority of CM were lost within 7 days after injection. Nevertheless, despite the initial cell loss, isolated patches of surviving iPS-CM could still be found in histological sections of the myocardium 28 days post transplantation. These data are in agreement with those reported for ES-CM and other cell types and indicate that despite the long-term survival of a minority of CM, efforts must be undertaken to improve their retention and survival after transplantation in order to maximize their therapeutic efficacy.
Methods
Ethics statement
All animal experiments described in this study were approved by the Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz NRW, 45659 Recklinghausen, Germany (Permit Number: 8.86–50.10.37.09.161) and conformed to the Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament. All efforts were made to minimize suffering of animals.
Generation of firefly luciferase expression vectors
Firefly luciferase expression vectors used in this study was generated by inserting either the ubiquitin C (UbC), phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) or chicken β-actin promoter with CMV enhancer (CAG) into the multiple cloning site of the promoterless pGL4.14 [luc2/Hygro] plasmid (Promega, Madison, WI). UbC promoter (pUbC) was amplified from plasmid pLenti6/UbC/V5-DEST (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) with Dream Taq PCR Master Mix (Fermentas, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) using primers flanked by restriction sites for XhoI and HindIII (Fermentas). pGL4.14 [luc2/Hygro] plasmid and the PCR-product were digested with both enzymes, purified with NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up-Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and ligated overnight at 4°C with Rapid DNA Ligation Kit (Fermentas) to yield the pGL4.14-pUbC [luc2/Hygro] vector. The PGK promoter was removed from the pPPGKIP vector by digestion with SalI and HindIII and subcloned between the XhoI and HindIII cutting sites of the pGL4.14 [luc2/Hygro] plasmid to obtain pGL4.14-pPGK [luc2/Hygro] vector. In order to generate plasmid in which FLuc expression is controlled by the CAG promoter, the CAG promoter sequence was isolated from plasmid pCAG-DsRed (Addgene plasmid 11151, [33]) with SalI and ligated into the plasmid pCDNA3.1-CMV-CD4-IRES-FLuc from which the CMV-promoter sequence was first removed by digestion with the isoschizomer XhoI. The CAG promoter in the resulting plasmid pCDNA3.1-pCAG-CD4-IRES-FLuc drives the expression of truncated human CD4 receptor (lacking its intracellular domain) and IRES-flanked FLuc. The detection of CD4 by flow cytometry on the surface of transgenic cells enabled additional means for monitoring the CAG promoter activity in undifferentiated iPSC and their derivatives at different stages of differentiation. In order to enable antibiotic selection of stably genetically modified cells, the entire CAG-CD4-IRES-FLuc cassette from pCDNA3.1-pCAG-CD4-IRES-FLuc plasmid was excised with ClaI and SpeI and ligated into ClaI and SpeI digested pGL4.14 [luc2/Hygro] plasmid (which removed the original luc2 sequence) to yield the pGL4.14-pCAG [CD4-IRES-FLuc/Hygro] plasmid. All ligation-products were used for transformation of E. coli and clones containing the correct insert were identified by colony-PCR. Plasmids were isolated using PureLink HiPure Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Invitrogen), validated by sequencing and used for electroporation of murine iPSC.
Establishment of stable transgenic firefly luciferase-expressing iPSC lines
In this study, we have used the murine iPSC line TiB7.4 that was generated from tail tip fibroblasts isolated from 129S4/Sv4JaeJ x C57BL/6 mice and was kindly provided by R. Jaenisch and A. Meissner [34]. Cells were first electroporated with a previously described plasmid vector αPIG [10] containing the PAC-gene and IRES-flanked EGFP-gene under the control of the cardiac specific alpha-myosin heavy chain (αMHC) gene promoter (GenBank Accession No. U71441) to generate the stable transgenic αPIG-iPSC line enabling isolation of pure iPS-CM (Fatima A. et al., manuscript in preparation). The FLuc expression plasmid pGL4.14-pUbC [luc2/Hygro] was then introduced into the αPIG-iPSC line (clone AT25) by electroporation. Plasmid was linearized with SalI and 5 µg were added to 5×106 cells in 1 ml phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The cells were electroporated using a Gene Pulser (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) at 250 V and 500 µFd in a 0.4 cm gap width mammalian cell cuvette (BioRad). The αPIG-iPSC line expressing FLuc and CD4 from CAG promoter was generated by nucleofection of 50,000 cells with 400 ng of SpeI-linearized pGL4.14-pCAG [CD4-IRES-FLuc/Hygro] plasmid in 20 µl of iPSC-specific nucleofection solution in a 96-well nucleofection cuvette placed in a 4D-Nucleofector (Lonza, Cologne, Germany). In addition to the above described iPSC lines, we have also generated murine ESC lines expressing FLuc under the control of the PGK promoter. For this purpose the αPIG-ESC line that was described previously [10] was electroporated with PstI-linearized pGL4.14-pPGK [luc2/Hygro] vector following the above described procedure. Immediately after pulsing or nucleofection, transfected cells were transferred at different densities (0.5×106 or 4.5×106 cells per plate for electroporated cells and 5×104 cells per plate for nucleofected cells) onto 10 cm dishes previously seeded with 1×106 hygromycin-resistant murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEF). Successfully transfected cells were selected with 50 µg/ml hygromycin (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA) with medium change every 48 hours. After 10 days, hygromycin resistant pUbC-FLuc and pCAG-CD4/FLuc αPIG-iPSC-colonies and pPGK-FLuc αPIG-ESC-colonies were picked into a 96-well format seeded with hygromycin-resistant MEF (1.5×104 cells per well), expanded, tested for BL intensity and either cryopreserved or used for further experiments.
Construction of a donor plasmid for transgene insertion into the ROSA26 locus
The DNA fragment containing UbC promoter driving constitutive expression of FLuc gene and SV40-promoter driving expression of a selectable marker for hygromycin resistance was isolated from pGL4.14-pUbC [luc2/Hygro] vector by digestion with restriction enzymes XhoI and SalI (Fermentas). The fragment was then ligated into the XhoI and SalI double digested pDonor-MCS-ROSA26 plasmid (Addgene Plasmid 37200, [35]), resulting in the plasmid pDonor-pUbC [luc2/Hygro]-ROSA26 (referred to hereafter as pUbC-FLuc-ROSA) (Figure S1 in File S1). Plasmid isolation and validation were performed as described above.
Targeted insertion of FLuc into ROSA26 locus of murine iPSC
In brief, 2×105 αPIG-iPSC were washed in PBS, centrifuged and resuspended in 10 µl R buffer (Neon Transfection System, Invitrogen) with a total of 4 µg of pUbC-FLuc-ROSA donor plasmid and 500 ng of each of the ZFN-encoding plasmid pCMV-RosaL6 and pCMV-RosaR4 that target the first intron of the ROSA26 locus [35] (Figure S1 in File S1). The cells were transfected with the Neon transfection system at 1400 V, 10 ms and 3 pulses. Cells were then immediately plated on 6 cm plates containing 0.8×106 hygromycin resistant MEF. Hygromycin selection (50 µg/ml) was started at day 5 after transfection. After a week of selection, individual clones were picked, expanded and characterized as described above.
Validation of ZFN-edited iPSC by Southern blot and PCR
In order to verify the correct insertion of a transgene into the ROSA26 locus, 20 µg of genomic DNA isolated from pUbC-FLuc-ROSA iPSC clones using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen) was digested with EcoRI, separated on a 0.8% agarose gel and transferred to a nylon membrane (Amersham Hybond XL, GE Healthcare Buckinghamshire, GB). Southern blot analysis was performed by using an external 1 kb probe located in the ROSA26 locus upstream of the transgene integration site that was isolated by BamHI-EcoRI digestion from a plasmid (A03) provided by Mao et al. [33] and labeled using α-32P-dCTP and the Ladderman Labeling Kit (Takara, Otsu, Japan). This probe detects the wild-type and targeted ROSA26 allele with sizes of 15630 and 4066 nt, respectively (Figure S1 in File S1). The integration of targeting construct into the ROSA26 locus was also verified by PCR using the forward primer binding to donor vector and reverse primer binding to ROSA26 locus downstream of the integration site (Figure S1 and Table S1 in File S1). The cycling program was: 94°C for 2 min followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 35 s, 60°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 65 s. PCR was performed with DreamTaq PCR Mastermix (Fermentas) using 200 ng of genomic DNA as a template. The presence of PCR product with the expected size of 950 bp was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide.
Cell culture and cardiac differentiation
All iPSC and ESC lines were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1× non-essential amino acids (NEAA), 100 µM β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME) and 1000 U/ml leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) on murine MEF and passaged every 2–3 days with a seeding density of 0.4×106 cells per 6 cm-dish containing 0.8×106 MEF. For cardiac differentiation, 2×106 cells were transferred into bacterial dishes containing differentiation medium composed of IMDM supplemented with 20% FBS, 1x NEAA and 100 µm β-ME to induce embryoid body (EB) formation in a dynamic suspension culture on a horizontal shaker. After two days, 3×104 EB were transferred into a 250 ml spinner flask (CELLspin 250, IBS Integra Biosciences, Fernwald, Germany) containing 200 ml of differentiation medium. At day 9 of differentiation, 50 ml of medium was replaced by fresh medium, and 8 µg/ml of puromycin (InvivoGen) was added to allow for selection of CM. On day 12 of differentiation, EB were transferred to 10 cm bacterial plates and further selected with puromycin for additional 3–4 days. For transplantation and functional analyses, the purified cardiac clusters were dissociated into single CM with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA supplemented with 5 U/ml of DNAse I (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). If not indicated otherwise, all cell culture media components were purchased from Invitrogen, Life Technologies.
Flow cytometry
Dissociated GFP-expressing CM were suspended in PBS without calcium and magnesium, supplemented with 0.2% FBS and analyzed with a BD FACScan (BD Pharmingen, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). 2×104 events were acquired. Dead cells were identified after propidium iodide (PI) addition and excluded by proper gating. Viable cells were then quantified for expression of EGFP by quadrant statistical analysis using Cyflogic freeware (http://www.cyflogic.com/). The expression of CD4 on the surface of CAG-CD4/FLuc αPIG-iPSC was determined by staining with a PE-conjugated antibody (cat. no. 555347, BD Pharmingen, Heidelberg, Germany) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Control cells were stained with an isotype control antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). Quantitative analysis of the data was performed with the Cyflogic freeware.
Measurement of bioluminescence in the microplate reader
For luminescence measurements, cells were centrifuged and lysed by resuspending in 50 µl BrightGlo-Buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany). For BL intensity-measurement, 5 µg of protein lysate were measured in triplicates with the BrightGlo Kit from Promega in a GeniosPro microplate reader (Tecan, Crailsheim, Germany) in white flat-bottom 96-well plates (Corning Life Sciences, Tewksbury, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
Promoter activity assay
The activity of the UbC promoter in pGL4.14 [luc2/Hygro] plasmid was determined in undifferentiated iPSC and purified iPS-CM. CM were differentiated from αPIG-iPSC and purified by puromycin selection. At day 16 of differentiation, the purified αPIG-iPSC-derived cardiac clusters were dissociated by 0.25% trypsin-EDTA and single CM seeded on plates coated with 2.5 µg/ml fibronectin (Sigma-Aldrich). 1×105 plated iPSC or CM were co-transfected with 1 µg of pGL4.14-pUbC [luc2/Hygro] expression plasmid and 1 µg of the renilla luciferase-encoding plasmid pRL-SV40P (Addgene plasmid 27163, [36]) as an internal control for transfection efficiency using Lipofectamine 2000 in OptiMEM (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. After 24 hours, cells were lysed with BrightGlo-Buffer as described above and luminescence of FLuc and renilla luciferase measured in the plate reader using the DualGlo-Kit (Promega).
Cell transplantation
For transplantation, defined numbers of FLuc-expressing iPS-CM were suspended in PBS containing calcium chloride and magnesium chloride. Male C57/BL6 mice were anesthetized with 3% isoflurane (Baxter, Unterschleißheim, Germany) in the absence of muscle relaxants, placed onto a heating plate warmed to 38°C, intubated and ventilated with a mixture of nitrous oxide and oxygen (1∶1) and 1.25% isoflurane at a rate of 130 heaves per minute with a volume of 0.5 to 0.8 ml, depending on the size of the animal. The mice were shaved at the injection site, and after performing a skin incision, the muscles were loosened and the thoracic cavity was opened by inserting a retractor into the intercostal space between the 3rd and 4th rib. The heart was exposed, the left ventricular myocardium was cryoinjured and 5 µl of cell suspension injected into the single peri-infarct region using a 25 µl Hamilton syringe (Model 702 RN SYR, Hamilton, Bonaduz, CH) and a 27G needle. Postoperative analgesia was provided by s.c. administration of Tramadol at 15 mg/kg after the extubation and at 1 mg/ml in the drinking water for 4 additional days (Gruenenthal, Aachen, Germany). For transplantations into the hind leg skeletal muscle, the dissociated UbC-FLuc or UbC-FLuc-ROSA iPS-CM were suspended in PBS and injected as described above.
Whole body and whole cell bioluminescence imaging
Prior to imaging, mice were injected intraperitoneally with 300 mg D-luciferin (Caliper Life Sciences, Hopkinton, MA, USA) per kg body weight in PBS. Ten minutes after substrate injection, the mice were anesthetized with 2.5% isoflurane and imaging was performed in an IVIS 200 system (Xenogen, Caliper Life Sciences) for 60 seconds at high binning. BL signal was quantified in the region of interest (ROI) with the software “Living Image 3D”, version 2.5.1. For experiments in which the BL signal intensity of undifferentiated FLuc-iPSC and purified FLuc-iPS-CM was determined in vitro prior to transplantation, different numbers of serially diluted cells were resuspended in PBS containing 15 mg/ml D-luciferin, 5 µl were transferred into black round-bottom 96-well plates and the BL intensity was measured in the IVIS after 10 min incubation with the same settings as described above.
Immunohistochemistry
After final BL measurements, mice were euthanized, hearts excised, flushed with PBS, embedded in Tissue-Tek O.C.T. (Sakura Finetek, Staufen, Germany) and snap-frozen in isobutane (2-methylpropane, Roth) cooled with dry ice and stored at −80°C. Hearts were cryo-sectioned (10 µm) along the short axis (transversal) using a cryotome CM-1950 (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Sections were postfixed for 5 minutes in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with primary antibodies for cardiac α-actinin (Cat. No. A7811, Sigma-Aldrich) diluted 1∶800 and EGFP (Cat. No. A11122, Molecular Probes, Eugene, USA) diluted 1∶200. Fluorescent secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 594 (Molecular Probes) were used to detect primary antibodies at the dilution of 1∶1000. Cell nuclei were visualized with Hoechst 33342 (Life Technologies) and cover slips were embedded using 10 µl mounting medium Prolong Gold (Life Technologies). Microphotographs were taken using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus, FluoView FV1000, Tokyo, Japan).
Results
BL intensity of pUbC-FLuc αPIG-iPSC decreases during spontaneous differentiation
To enable in vivo BL tracking of transplanted iPS-CM, a genetically modified iPSC line expressing EGFP and puromycin resistance under the cardiac specific αMHC promoter (Fatima A. et al., manuscript in preparation) was transfected with the expression plasmid containing firefly luciferase gene under the control of the constitutive UbC promoter and the antibiotic resistance gene hygromycin B phosphotransferase regulated by the SV40 promoter ( Figure 1A ). Ninety-six pUbC-FLuc αPIG-iPSC-clones were selected ten days after initiation of the hygromycin selection and tested in vitro for FLuc activity. Fourteen clones that showed various levels of BL intensity ( Figure 1B ) were expanded for further testing. Of those, the iPSC clones C3 and C5 retained stable FLuc activity over 12 passages ( Figure 1C ) and expressed pluripotency markers alkaline phosphatase, Oct4 and SSEA1 at levels similar to the parental iPSC line (data not shown). When these clones were subjected to spontaneous differentiation over 16 days, the FLuc activity strongly decreased in EB of both analyzed clones with similar kinetics ( Figure 1D ). The slight loss of FLuc activity in EB cells on day 4 of differentiation was followed by massive reduction of FLuc intensity on day 8. By termination of the experiment on day 16 of differentiation 15.2±10.1% (clone C3) and 19.9±3.0% (clone C5) of the original FLuc activity in the pluripotent state of each respective clone was measured ( Figure 1D ). The decrease of FLuc mRNA expression levels in EB of these two clones was less pronounced, but followed a pattern similar to that observed for the BL activity. At day 16 of differentiation, the FLuc transcript levels in EB cells of clone C3 and C5 decreased, respectively, to 33.1±28.2% and 46.5±4.5% of the original FLuc mRNA levels in iPSC ( Figure 1E ).
FLuc activity in purified UbC-FLuc iPS-CM in vitro
Our functional analyses revealed that genetic modification of iPSC did not alter their cardiac differentiation capacity and that drug selected pUbC-FLuc αPIG-iPS-CM displayed normal structural and functional properties (Supplemental data and Figure S2 in File S1). We next determined the BL activity in purified CM derived from clones C3 and C5. The BL intensity in CM lysates decreased in two independent differentiation experiments to 7.4±1.7% and 10.8±7.5% of the initial BL activity in FLuc-αPIG-iPSC, respectively ( Figure 1F ). In order to determine the FLuc mRNA levels qPCR was performed. Interestingly, the decrease at the FLuc transcript level was less pronounced compared to the decrease in BL activity. Relative to the FLuc mRNA levels in undifferentiated iPSC, the expression of FLuc mRNA in purified CM derived from iPSC clones C3 and C5 was diminished to 57.0±18.8% and 51.8±5.7% of the levels in iPSC, respectively ( Figure 1G ). The observed reduction of BL activity and FLuc transcript levels during differentiation could be due to differences in the ability of the transcriptional machinery of undifferentiated iPSC and purified CM to activate the UbC promoter driving the expression of FLuc. To address this question, we assessed the pUbC activity in parental non-luminescent αPIG-iPSC and purified CM derived from them. Cells were co-transfected with the pUbC-pGL4.14 [luc2/Hygro] plasmid and a renilla luciferase expression plasmid pRL-SV40P that served as a transfection control. No differences in UbC promoter activity between undifferentiated iPSC and purified CM were detected 24 hours after transfection ( Figure 1H ), suggesting that the reduction of Fluc activity in CM resulted from epigenetic silencing of the stably integrated vector during differentiation of iPSC.
FLuc silencing occurs during spontaneous differentiation independently of the promoter used
To determine whether the decline of Fluc activity in CM could be alleviated by employing another strong constitutive promoter, we generated additional αPIG-iPSC lines in which FLuc expression is driven by a synthetic CAG-promoter which was previously shown to yield the highest levels of transgene expression among eight different promoters tested after transient transfection of murine ESC [37]. The extracellular portion of CD4 receptor was co-expressed with FLuc to provide another method to quantify promoter activity during differentiation ( Figure 2A ). Consistent with the UbC-FLuc αPIG-iPSC line, the pCAG-CD4/FLuc αPIG-iPSC lines displayed clonal variability of FLuc intensity in pluripotent state ( Figure 2B ) and a pronounced decrease of BL signal intensity during spontaneous differentiation to 49±50.2% (clone A1) and 15.8±8.2% (clone C4) on day 8 and 26.2±19.5% (clone A1) and 32.5±24.8% (clone C4) at day 16 of differentiation ( Figure 2C ). After purification of CM on day 16 of differentiation, the Fluc activity decreased even further in clone A1 and slightly increased in clone C4 ( Figure 2C ). The pronounced expression of the CAG-driven CD4-receptor on the surface of undifferentiated iPSC rapidly declined in differentiated EB cells and in purified CM, mirroring the reduction of FLuc activity in these clonal cell lines ( Figure 2D,E ). Comparable decline of FLuc activity in the course of differentiation was also observed in murine αPIG-ESC lines in which FLuc expression was under the control of a constitutive PGK promoter (Figure S3D in File S1). This was accompanied by a similar decrease of FLuc transcript levels in differentiated cells (Figure S3E in File S1). These data indicate that significant transgene silencing occurs during differentiation of murine iPSC and ESC independently of the promoter used or the nature of the expressed transgene, and that a different approach for genetic modification of pluripotent stem cells is required to overcome epigenetic repression of transgene expression.
Transgene insertion into ROSA26 locus reduces FLuc silencing in iPS-CM
To avoid excessive down-regulation of the FLuc transgene, we generated a FLuc-αPIG-iPS cell line using ZFN-targeted insertion of the reporter gene driven by UbC-promoter into the silencing-resistant locus ROSA26 [38]. Insertion of the construct into the target region was confirmed by Southern blot analysis. Besides the 15630 bp wild-type fragment, the insertion of the FLuc-cassette was verified by appearance of the 4066 bp targeted DNA fragment using the external ROSA26 probe ( Figure 3A and Figure S1 in File S1). The correct insertion of the pUbC[luc2/Hygro] cassette into the ROSA26 locus was also confirmed by PCR, using genomic DNA as a template and primers binding in the insert and the genomic region downstream of the target integration site (Table S1 in File S1), yielding a 950 bp product that was detected in clones 1, 2 and 3 of transgenic pUbC-FLuc-ROSA iPSC, but not in parental iPSC, iPSC transfected only with donor plasmid or ZFN-expression plasmids, and in reactions containing pure donor plasmid ( Figure 3B ). The pUbC-FLuc-ROSA αPIG-iPSC differentiated into GFP-positive CM expressing cardiac α-actinin and exhibiting cross-striations typical of immature CM ( Figure 3C,E ). The assessment of the UbC-driven FLuc activity in ZFN-engineered αPIG-iPSC clones 2 and 3 showed that the FLuc activity decreased, respectively, by 38.9% and 34.3% in antibiotic selected iPS-CM relative to that in pluripotent cells ( Figure 3D ). However, this decrease was significantly lower than that observed in iPS-CM derived from pUbC-FLuc iPSC that were generated by random transgene integration, which lost more than 90% of FLuc activity found in undifferentiated pUbC-FLuc iPSC (see Figure 1F ). These data suggest that integration of foreign genes into the ROSA26 locus significantly reduces transgene silencing, which may enhance the sensitivity of detection of transplanted cells in vivo.
BL intensity is dependent on the cell line, cell dose and the site of cell injection
One of the prerequisite for accurate optical in vivo imaging of transplanted cells is a linear relationship between the BL intensity and the cell dose. In vitro comparative BL imaging of serial dilutions of undifferentiated pUbC-FLuc and pUbC-FLuc-ROSA αPIG-iPSC and subsequently purified CM revealed a linear correlation between the BL intensities and cell numbers of both cell types and cell lines ( Figure 4A,B ). In these experiments, undifferentiated FLuc-ROSA-iPSC exhibited slightly higher (22%) levels of BL intensity than FLuc-iPSC. Both iPSC populations emitted stronger BL signal than their purified CM. In agreement with the reduced level of silencing of FLuc integrated into the ROSA26 locus the decrease of the BL signal intensity was much less pronounced in FLuc-ROSA-iPS-CM (2.13±0.17 fold) than in FLuc-iPS-CM (4.43±0.63 fold), relative to their undifferentiated counterparts ( Figure 4B ). Accordingly, purified FLuc-ROSA-iPS-CM showed 2.5±0.2-fold higher FLuc activity than purified FLuc iPS-CM ( Figure 4B ). In order to validate the dose dependency and detection sensitivity in vivo, defined numbers of FLuc-ROSA iPSC and puromycin selected FLuc-ROSA iPS-CM were transplanted into the hind limb muscle of mice. This site was selected due to the simplicity of the transplantation procedure compared to open heart surgery and higher efficiency of cell delivery into skeletal muscle as opposed to highly contracting myocardium. BL measurement 6 h after transplantation revealed a linear correlation between optical signal intensity and a number of transplanted FLuc-ROSA iPSC and iPS-CM ( Figure 4C,D ). Although 1×105 and 2×105 transplanted iPS-CM generated, respectively, 3.0- and 2.5-fold weaker BL signal than injected iPSC they were still detectable at high sensitivity. Intramyocardially injected FLuc-ROSA iPS-CM (5×105/heart) produced at 6 h after transplantation a BL signal that was about 7–10-fold weaker than that produced by the same number of CM injected into the skeletal muscle (compare Figure 4D and 4F ). However, FLuc-ROSA-iPS-CM injected into the heart showed about 4-fold higher BL signal intensity than FLuc-iPS-CM ( Figure 4E,F ), confirming much higher in vivo detection sensitivity of CM expressing FLuc from ROSA26 locus compared to those expressing FLuc from random loci.
Survival kinetics of CM transplanted into the cryoinfarcted heart
To assess the kinetics of CM retention in vivo, 5×105 purified pUbC-FLuc-ROSA iPS-CM and pUbC-FLuc iPS-CM were injected into the periinfarct area of a cryoinjured heart of syngeneic C57/BL6 mice. BL intensity was measured between day 0 and day 28 after transplantation ( Figure 5A ; Figure S4 in File S1). The BL signal intensity of transplanted FLuc-ROSA iPS-CM or FLuc-iPS-CM dropped 24 hours after transplantation to 44.7±9.4% and 29.2±7.2% of the value obtained on day 0, respectively, and then increased again on postoperative day 3 in the absence of significant CM proliferation (Figure S4 in File S1). Due to difficulty in obtaining stable baseline signal intensity during the first day after cell injection (which was also reported by others [25], [39]), we performed normalization of signal intensities obtained on days 7, 14, 21 and 28 after transplantation according to signal detected on day 3 postinjection. Using this approach to determine the kinetics of CM retention, we found that the optical signal on day 7 after transplantation decreased to 45±36% in FLuc-ROSA iPS-CM and 34±22% in FLuc iPS-CM compared to the BL intensity in the corresponding group on day 3 ( Figure 5B ). The signal intensity decreased further at a slower rate in both experimental groups and reached on postoperative day 28 about 8% of day 3 signal intensity. After termination of the experiments, heart tissue was histologically analyzed for the presence of EGFP-positive cells. This analysis revealed EGFP-positive areas in the peri-infarct area of both FLuc-ROSA-iPS-CM- and FLuc-iPS-CM-transplanted hearts. Staining of these sections for the sarcomeric α-actinin showed that the transplanted CM possess typical cross-striations which show a tendency of alignment with the surrounding host tissue ( Figure 5C ). However, neither the scar size nor the capillarization in the peri-infarct area was affected by CM transplantation (Figure S5 and Supplemental data in File S1), presumably due to an insufficient number of retained cells. We did not observe presence and outgrowth of any other cell types or indications of teratocarcinoma formation in any of the animals injected with purified FLuc-iPS-CM. These data demonstrate that the majority of iPS-CM are lost in the cryoinjured heart within the first few days post transplantation. However, despite this initial cell loss a small fraction of injected CM is able to survive until day 28 at numbers insufficient to bring about a measurable therapeutic benefit.
Discussion
Low cell retention after transplantation into infarcted heart is the major obstacle to successful clinical translation of cell-based heart repair approaches. This problem occurs independently of the transplanted cell type, the site of transplantation or the delivery method. Therefore, it is of major importance to address this problem in order to improve the engraftment and enhance the therapeutic efficacy of transplanted cells. BL imaging using FLuc is a powerful method for the quantitative assessment of cell survival in vivo and has frequently been used for longitudinal monitoring of various types of intramyocardially transplanted cells in small animals including adult stem cells [16], [40]–[46], fibroblasts [16], embryonic cardiomyoblasts [26], [47], [48], cardiac stem cells [24], [49]–[51], undifferentiated ESC [52], [53], ESC-derived endothelial cells [54] and ES-CM [22], [23], [31], [55]. In this study we describe the generation of transgenic murine iPSC lines in which constitutively active FLuc and CM-specific PAC and EGFP expression allow for isolation, longitudinal in vivo bioluminescent tracking and in situ fluorescent detection of highly purified iPS-CM. We established 2 stably transgenic pUbC-FLuc iPSC clones that maintained high BL activity in long-term culture in an undifferentiated state. However, the expression of a pUbC-driven FLuc transgene was largely reduced in these iPSC after inducing differentiation by EB formation as well as in purified iPS-CM. This phenomenon was also observed in transgenic murine iPSC lines in which the FLuc and CD4 receptor expression were under the control of a composite CAG promoter. A similar problem was also encountered when FLuc was expressed from the constitutive PGK promoter in a murine αPIG ESC line. These observations are in agreement with previous reports about transgene silencing in stem cells and their differentiated derivatives that was attributed to extensive DNA methylation of promoter sequences and histone modifications [56]–[60].
Epigenetic silencing of exogenous sequences is a major obstacle to efficient transgene expression in pluripotent stem cells and their differentiated derivatives, and negatively impacts their use for studying stem cell differentiation, engraftment and disease modelling. In order to protect transgenes from being silenced, sequences which actively prevent silencing, such as sea urchin insulator [61], cHS4 chromatin insulator elements [57], ubiquitous chromatin opening elements [58] and epigenetic human Matrix Attachment Region (MAR) control elements have been incorporated into the expression vectors and are shown to block transgene silencing in engineered pluripotent stem cell lines. However, due to random integration of such vectors into the host genome, this approach is still not ideal to obtain genetically intact and homogenous reporter cell lines. New technologies for site-specific transgene insertion by using zinc finger nucleases [62] or transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN) [63] are capable of integrating transgenes into genomic regions in which silencing is greatly reduced or eliminated [49], [55]. Indeed, we achieved a significant reduction of silencing of FLuc in iPS-CM by integrating the pUbC-driven FLuc cassette into the ROSA26 locus using ZFN-based genome editing. However, even in this scenario FLuc activity decreased after differentiation to CM. Although this may have occurred, at least in part, due to differential regulation of promoter activity in iPSC and CM, choosing the appropriately designed promoter and vector sequences may still be crucial to enable strong and stable transgene expression in pluripotent stem cell derivatives [37], [57]. Nevertheless, purified iPS-CM were readily detectable in vivo after cardiac transplantation producing a robust BL signal that was about 4-fold higher in hearts with transplanted FLuc-ROSA iPS-CM compared to iPS-CM carrying randomly integrated FLuc transgene, reflecting different degree of FLuc silencing during differentiation of these two iPSC lines. The in vivo BL signal of injected FLuc-ROSA-iPS-CM was about 10-fold higher when cells were transplanted into the hind leg skeletal muscle than into the heart. These results most likely reflect the differential rate of mechanical cell loss in these two organs immediately upon injection, and/or a more pronounced attenuation of a BL signal emitted from deeper tissue layers in infarcted heart than from more superficially located healthy hind leg muscle. FLuc-expressing iPS-CM retained structural and functional characteristics typical of native iPS-CM [20], [64]. This is in agreement with previously published reports demonstrating that various stable reporter proteins did not significantly alter characteristics of undifferentiated ESC and CM derived from them [23], [49], [65], [66], indicating that BL imaging is a suitable method for non-invasive and longitudinal in vivo imaging of cardiac ESC and iPSC derivatives. The in vivo optical signal of both iPS-CM populations analyzed in this study decreased rapidly in the first week post-injection and continued to drop at a slower rate until the end of the observation period. This CM survival kinetics did not seem to be affected by the genomic site into which the FLuc transgene was integrated. The presence of small areas of surviving iPS-CM in the peri-infarct area of myocardium on day 28 day post transplantation demonstrates that a fraction of the transplanted iPS-CM is capable of long-term survival. Therefore, in order to improve cell retention methods should be developed to prevent the rapid cell loss early after cell injection and increase the long-term survival of retained cells.
Our observations about the rapid iPS-CM loss are in agreement with those reported for intramyocardially transplanted ES-CM and other cell types. Wu and coworkers were the first group demonstrating the usefulness of BL imaging for monitoring the location and survival of intramyocardially transplanted cells in living rats by employing embryonic rat H9c2 cardiomyoblasts expressing the Fluc reporter gene [26]. A drastic reduction of the BL signal intensity within the first 4 days after transplantation was observed with less than 10% of initial BL signal intensity remaining on day 16 after transplantation, comparable to our findings. The first study that assessed the survival of partially purified human ES-CM showed that more than 90% of cells died within the first 21 days after delivery into the ischemic myocardium of SCID mice [23]. Other studies investigated the retention of bioluminescent adult stem cells [67], cardiac stem cells [49], human ESC-derived endothelial cells [55] and purified human ES-CM [22], [55] consistently reported rapid loss and low survival of cells transplanted into the ischemic heart, irrespective of the genetic background of the recipient, the transplanted cell type and their proliferation rate, suggesting that common factors negatively affect the survival of various cell types in the heart.
A number of factors influence acute and long-term cell retention. Immediately after direct intramyocardial injection a large proportion of cells is lost due to mechanical leakage from the injection site, facilitated by the contracting myocardium and local bleeding [25]. These factors are most likely responsible for a rapid loss of iPS-CM in the first minutes and hours after injection. However, these early effects are difficult to analyze with BL imaging due to unpredictable BL signal variability in the first 24 hours post cell injection [25]. It was recently reported that the enzymatic dissociation of the cells and the transplantation vehicle significantly interfere with the cellular energy metabolism resulting in a survival-independent bias of BL-signal obtained during the first 24 hours after transplantation due to its dependence on ATP availability [39]. We have also encountered unexpected fluctuations of BL signal intensity in the first 48 hours post cell transplantation, and this is why we have chosen to analyse the CM survival kinetics from postoperative day three onwards. At that time the cell energy metabolism was expected to have recovered from enzymatic dissociation and oxygen and nutrient deprivation in the cardiac tissue disrupted by infarction and the injection needle.
Among other factors that diminish cell retention after transplantation are lack of integration into the host tissue and apoptosis due to adverse effects of tissue microenvironment, inflammation and immune rejection at the site of injection. We have previously shown that dissociated murine ES-CM were not capable of forming secondary cardiospheres in hanging drops and attaching quantitatively to any of 16 tested 2-dimensional biomaterials [68], indicating that purified CM have highly selective requirements for cell-to-cell or cell-to-extracellular matrix interactions, which may not be available in the damaged myocardium early upon injection. Various approaches have been tested to enhance the survival of transplanted cells in the myocardium. These include the preconditioning of cells prior to injection with various pro-survival factors (cytokines, growth factors, drugs, microRNAs) [50], [69] or physical stimuli (hypoxia, heat shock) [70], [71], transplantation of cell sheets [72] or cells embedded in tissue-engineered 3D matrices [47], instead of direct injection of enzymatically dissociated cells. In addition, genetic engineering of cells to stably express pro-survival or angiogenic factors [51], [73] and use of more immature cells for transplantation that display higher proliferation rates and increased hypoxia resistance than mature cells [22] were used. Finally, co-transplantation of supportive cell types, such as mesenchymal stromal cells, that may increase the engraftment of primary therapeutic cells by providing anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic and pro-angiogenic stimuli [73], [74] represents an especially interesting approach. The FLuc expressing ZFN-engineered iPS-CM generated in this study will enable further optimization of combined approaches for improving the survival, integration and therapeutic efficacy of iPS-CM as a highly accessible in vitro source of cells for heart repair.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Nadin Lange, Laura Hartmann, Meike Brenkmann, Annalena Henrich and Johann van de Burgwal for their excellent technical assistance, Connie Cepko (Harvard Medical School, Department of Genetics, Boston, MA, USA) for providing pCAG-DsRed plasmid, Ron Prywes (Columbia University, New York, NY, USA) for pRL-SV40P plasmid, and Charles A. Gersbach, Pablo Perez-Pinera (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA), Michael Hesse and Caroline Geisen (Institute for Physiology I and Life&Brain Center, University of Bonn, Germany) for donating pDonor MCS Rosa26 plasmid and pCMV-RosaL6 and pCMV-RosaR4 ZFN-expressing plasmids.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the grants from the Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF, http://www.bmbf.de/) to T.Š. (grant No. 01GN0947) and from the Else-Kröner-Fresenius Stiftung (http://www.ekfs.de/de/start.html) to T.Š. and K.N. (grant No. A93/2008). Further funding was provided by the Maria Pesch Stiftung and Köln-Fortune Program (http://www.medfak.uni-koeln.de/index.php?id=195) to T.Š. and by the Volkswagen Foundation (http://www.volkswagenstiftung.de/) to M.H. (I/83 443). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, et al. (2012) Heart disease and stroke statistics–2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 125: e2–e220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Burt RK, Chen YH, Verda L, Lucena C, Navale S, et al. (2012) Mitotically inactivated embryonic stem cells can be used as an in vivo feeder layer to nurse damaged myocardium after acute myocardial infarction: a preclinical study. Circ Res 111: 1286–1296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Singla DK, Lyons GE, Kamp TJ (2007) Transplanted embryonic stem cells following mouse myocardial infarction inhibit apoptosis and cardiac remodeling. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 293: H1308–1314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Nelson TJ, Martinez-Fernandez A, Yamada S, Perez-Terzic C, Ikeda Y, et al. (2009) Repair of acute myocardial infarction by human stemness factors induced pluripotent stem cells. Circulation 120: 408–416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Yan B, Abdelli LS, Singla DK (2011) Transplanted induced pluripotent stem cells improve cardiac function and induce neovascularization in the infarcted hearts of db/db mice. Mol Pharm 8: 1602–1610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Liu Y, Ye X, Mao L, Cheng Z, Yao X, et al. (2013) Transplantation of parthenogenetic embryonic stem cells ameliorates cardiac dysfunction and remodelling after myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res 97: 208–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ahmed RP, Haider HK, Buccini S, Li L, Jiang S, et al. (2011) Reprogramming of skeletal myoblasts for induction of pluripotency for tumor-free cardiomyogenesis in the infarcted heart. Circ Res 109: 60–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Caspi O, Huber I, Kehat I, Habib M, Arbel G, et al. (2007) Transplantation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes improves myocardial performance in infarcted rat hearts. J Am Coll Cardiol 50: 1884–1893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Didie M, Christalla P, Rubart M, Muppala V, Doker S, et al. (2013) Parthenogenetic stem cells for tissue-engineered heart repair. J Clin Invest 123: 1285–1298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kolossov E, Bostani T, Roell W, Breitbach M, Pillekamp F, et al. (2006) Engraftment of engineered ES cell-derived cardiomyocytes but not BM cells restores contractile function to the infarcted myocardium. J Exp Med 203: 2315–2327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Miki K, Uenaka H, Saito A, Miyagawa S, Sakaguchi T, et al. (2012) Bioengineered myocardium derived from induced pluripotent stem cells improves cardiac function and attenuates cardiac remodeling following chronic myocardial infarction in rats. Stem Cells Transl Med 1: 430–437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Shiba Y, Fernandes S, Zhu WZ, Filice D, Muskheli V, et al. (2012) Human ES-cell-derived cardiomyocytes electrically couple and suppress arrhythmias in injured hearts. Nature 489: 322–325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Li TS, Cheng K, Malliaras K, Smith RR, Zhang Y, et al. (2012) Direct comparison of different stem cell types and subpopulations reveals superior paracrine potency and myocardial repair efficacy with cardiosphere-derived cells. J Am Coll Cardiol 59: 942–953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Matsuura K, Honda A, Nagai T, Fukushima N, Iwanaga K, et al. (2009) Transplantation of cardiac progenitor cells ameliorates cardiac dysfunction after myocardial infarction in mice. J Clin Invest 119: 2204–2217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Assmus B, Rolf A, Erbs S, Elsasser A, Haberbosch W, et al. (2010) Clinical outcome 2 years after intracoronary administration of bone marrow-derived progenitor cells in acute myocardial infarction. Circ Heart Fail 3: 89–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. van der Bogt KE, Sheikh AY, Schrepfer S, Hoyt G, Cao F, et al. (2008) Comparison of different adult stem cell types for treatment of myocardial ischemia. Circulation 118: S121–129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kehat I, Khimovich L, Caspi O, Gepstein A, Shofti R, et al. (2004) Electromechanical integration of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 22: 1282–1289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Gupta MK, Illich DJ, Gaarz A, Matzkies M, Nguemo F, et al. (2010) Global transcriptional profiles of beating clusters derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are highly similar. BMC Dev Biol 10: 98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Gherghiceanu M, Barad L, Novak A, Reiter I, Itskovitz-Eldor J, et al. (2011) Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells: comparative ultrastructure. J Cell Mol Med 15: 2539–2551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kuzmenkin A, Liang H, Xu G, Pfannkuche K, Eichhorn H, et al. (2009) Functional characterization of cardiomyocytes derived from murine induced pluripotent stem cells in vitro. FASEB J 23: 4168–4180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zhang J, Wilson GF, Soerens AG, Koonce CH, Yu J, et al. (2009) Functional cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Circ Res 104: e30–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Boheler KR, Joodi RN, Qiao H, Juhasz O, Urick AL, et al. (2011) Embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte heterogeneity and the isolation of immature and committed cells for cardiac remodeling and regeneration. Stem Cells Int 2011: 214203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Cao F, Wagner RA, Wilson KD, Xie X, Fu JD, et al. (2008) Transcriptional and functional profiling of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. PLoS One 3: e3474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Li Z, Lee A, Huang M, Chun H, Chung J, et al. (2009) Imaging survival and function of transplanted cardiac resident stem cells. J Am Coll Cardiol 53: 1229–1240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Terrovitis JV, Smith RR, Marban E (2010) Assessment and optimization of cell engraftment after transplantation into the heart. Circ Res 106: 479–494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Wu JC, Chen IY, Sundaresan G, Min JJ, De A, et al. (2003) Molecular imaging of cardiac cell transplantation in living animals using optical bioluminescence and positron emission tomography. Circulation 108: 1302–1305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Wu KH, Mo XM, Han ZC, Zhou B (2011) Stem cell engraftment and survival in the ischemic heart. Ann Thorac Surg 92: 1917–1925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Muller-Ehmsen J, Whittaker P, Kloner RA, Dow JS, Sakoda T, et al. (2002) Survival and development of neonatal rat cardiomyocytes transplanted into adult myocardium. J Mol Cell Cardiol 34: 107–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Zhang WY, Ebert AD, Narula J, Wu JC (2011) Imaging cardiac stem cell therapy: translations to human clinical studies. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 4: 514–522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. de Almeida PE, van Rappard JR, Wu JC (2011) In vivo bioluminescence for tracking cell fate and function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 301: H663–671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kammili RK, Taylor DG, Xia J, Osuala K, Thompson K, et al. (2010) Generation of novel reporter stem cells and their application for molecular imaging of cardiac-differentiated stem cells in vivo. Stem Cells Dev 19: 1437–1448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Urnov FD, Rebar EJ, Holmes MC, Zhang HS, Gregory PD (2010) Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases. Nat Rev Genet 11: 636–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Mao X, Fujiwara Y, Orkin SH (1999) Improved reporter strain for monitoring Cre recombinase-mediated DNA excisions in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 5037–5042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Meissner A, Wernig M, Jaenisch R (2007) Direct reprogramming of genetically unmodified fibroblasts into pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 25: 1177–1181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Perez-Pinera P, Ousterout DG, Brown MT, Gersbach CA (2012) Gene targeting to the ROSA26 locus directed by engineered zinc finger nucleases. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 3741–3752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Chen X, Prywes R (1999) Serum-induced expression of the cdc25A gene by relief of E2F-mediated repression. Mol Cell Biol 19: 4695–4702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Chen CM, Krohn J, Bhattacharya S, Davies B (2011) A comparison of exogenous promoter activity at the ROSA26 locus using a PhiiC31 integrase mediated cassette exchange approach in mouse ES cells. PLoS One 6: e23376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Zambrowicz BP, Imamoto A, Fiering S, Herzenberg LA, Kerr WG, et al. (1997) Disruption of overlapping transcripts in the ROSA beta geo 26 gene trap strain leads to widespread expression of beta-galactosidase in mouse embryos and hematopoietic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 3789–3794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Chang C, Chan A, Lin X, Higuchi T, Terrovitis J, et al. (2013) Cellular bioenergetics is an important determinant of the molecular imaging signal derived from luciferase and the sodium-iodide symporter. Circ Res 112: 441–450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Bai X, Yan Y, Coleman M, Wu G, Rabinovich B, et al. (2011) Tracking long-term survival of intramyocardially delivered human adipose tissue-derived stem cells using bioluminescence imaging. Mol Imaging Biol 13: 633–645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Sheikh AY, Huber BC, Narsinh KH, Spin JM, van der Bogt K, et al. (2012) In vivo functional and transcriptional profiling of bone marrow stem cells after transplantation into ischemic myocardium. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 32: 92–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Min JJ, Ahn Y, Moon S, Kim YS, Park JE, et al. (2006) In vivo bioluminescence imaging of cord blood derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation into rat myocardium. Ann Nucl Med 20: 165–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Swijnenburg RJ, Govaert JA, van der Bogt KE, Pearl JI, Huang M, et al. (2010) Timing of bone marrow cell delivery has minimal effects on cell viability and cardiac recovery after myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3: 77–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Westrich J, Yaeger P, He C, Stewart J, Chen R, et al. (2010) Factors affecting residence time of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) injected into the myocardium. Cell Transplant 19: 937–948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Li SH, Lai TY, Sun Z, Han M, Moriyama E, et al. (2009) Tracking cardiac engraftment and distribution of implanted bone marrow cells: Comparing intra-aortic, intravenous, and intramyocardial delivery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137: 1225–1233 e1221. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 46. Sheikh AY, Lin SA, Cao F, Cao Y, van der Bogt KE, et al. (2007) Molecular imaging of bone marrow mononuclear cell homing and engraftment in ischemic myocardium. Stem Cells 25: 2677–2684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Kutschka I, Chen IY, Kofidis T, Arai T, von Degenfeld G, et al. (2006) Collagen matrices enhance survival of transplanted cardiomyoblasts and contribute to functional improvement of ischemic rat hearts. Circulation 114: I167–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Rodriguez-Porcel M, Gheysens O, Paulmurugan R, Chen IY, Peterson KM, et al. (2010) Antioxidants improve early survival of cardiomyoblasts after transplantation to the myocardium. Mol Imaging Biol 12: 325–334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Lan F, Liu J, Narsinh KH, Hu S, Han L, et al. (2012) Safe genetic modification of cardiac stem cells using a site-specific integration technique. Circulation 126: S20–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Hu S, Huang M, Nguyen PK, Gong Y, Li Z, et al. (2011) Novel microRNA prosurvival cocktail for improving engraftment and function of cardiac progenitor cell transplantation. Circulation 124: S27–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Mohsin S, Khan M, Toko H, Bailey B, Cottage CT, et al. (2012) Human cardiac progenitor cells engineered with Pim-I kinase enhance myocardial repair. J Am Coll Cardiol 60: 1278–1287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Xie X, Cao F, Sheikh AY, Li Z, Connolly AJ, et al. (2007) Genetic modification of embryonic stem cells with VEGF enhances cell survival and improves cardiac function. Cloning Stem Cells 9: 549–563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Lee AS, Tang C, Cao F, Xie X, van der Bogt K, et al. (2009) Effects of cell number on teratoma formation by human embryonic stem cells. Cell Cycle 8: 2608–2612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Li Z, Wu JC, Sheikh AY, Kraft D, Cao F, et al. (2007) Differentiation, survival, and function of embryonic stem cell derived endothelial cells for ischemic heart disease. Circulation 116: I46–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Wang Y, Zhang WY, Hu S, Lan F, Lee AS, et al. (2012) Genome editing of human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells with zinc finger nucleases for cellular imaging. Circ Res 111: 1494–1503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Herbst F, Ball CR, Tuorto F, Nowrouzi A, Wang W, et al. (2012) Extensive methylation of promoter sequences silences lentiviral transgene expression during stem cell differentiation in vivo. Mol Ther 20: 1014–1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Macarthur CC, Xue H, Van Hoof D, Lieu PT, Dudas M, et al. (2012) Chromatin insulator elements block transgene silencing in engineered human embryonic stem cell lines at a defined chromosome 13 locus. Stem Cells Dev 21: 191–205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Pfaff N, Lachmann N, Ackermann M, Kohlscheen S, Brendel C, et al. (2013) A ubiquitous chromatin opening element prevents transgene silencing in pluripotent stem cells and their differentiated progeny. Stem Cells 31: 488–499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Krishnan M, Park JM, Cao F, Wang D, Paulmurugan R, et al. (2006) Effects of epigenetic modulation on reporter gene expression: implications for stem cell imaging. FASEB J 20: 106–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. He J, Yang Q, Chang LJ (2005) Dynamic DNA methylation and histone modifications contribute to lentiviral transgene silencing in murine embryonic carcinoma cells. J Virol 79: 13497–13508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Hino S, Fan J, Taguwa S, Akasaka K, Matsuoka M (2004) Sea urchin insulator protects lentiviral vector from silencing by maintaining active chromatin structure. Gene Ther 11: 819–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Hockemeyer D, Soldner F, Beard C, Gao Q, Mitalipova M, et al. (2009) Efficient targeting of expressed and silent genes in human ESCs and iPSCs using zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 27: 851–857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Ding Q, Lee YK, Schaefer EA, Peters DT, Veres A, et al. (2013) A TALEN genome-editing system for generating human stem cell-based disease models. Cell Stem Cell 12: 238–251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Pfannkuche K, Liang H, Hannes T, Xi J, Fatima A, et al. (2009) Cardiac myocytes derived from murine reprogrammed fibroblasts: intact hormonal regulation, cardiac ion channel expression and development of contractility. Cell Physiol Biochem 24: 73–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Wu JC, Cao F, Dutta S, Xie X, Kim E, et al. (2006) Proteomic analysis of reporter genes for molecular imaging of transplanted embryonic stem cells. Proteomics 6: 6234–6249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Wu JC, Spin JM, Cao F, Lin S, Xie X, et al. (2006) Transcriptional profiling of reporter genes used for molecular imaging of embryonic stem cell transplantation. Physiol Genomics 25: 29–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. van der Bogt KE, Schrepfer S, Yu J, Sheikh AY, Hoyt G, et al. (2009) Comparison of transplantation of adipose tissue- and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the infarcted heart. Transplantation 87: 642–652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Pfannkuche K, Neuss S, Pillekamp F, Frenzel LP, Attia W, et al. (2010) Fibroblasts facilitate the engraftment of embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes on three-dimensional collagen matrices and aggregation in hanging drops. Stem Cells Dev 19: 1589–1599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Laflamme MA, Chen KY, Naumova AV, Muskheli V, Fugate JA, et al. (2007) Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts. Nat Biotechnol 25: 1015–1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Laflamme MA, Gold J, Xu C, Hassanipour M, Rosler E, et al. (2005) Formation of human myocardium in the rat heart from human embryonic stem cells. Am J Pathol 167: 663–671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Haider H, Ashraf M (2008) Strategies to promote donor cell survival: combining preconditioning approach with stem cell transplantation. J Mol Cell Cardiol 45: 554–566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Sekine H, Shimizu T, Dobashi I, Matsuura K, Hagiwara N, et al. (2011) Cardiac cell sheet transplantation improves damaged heart function via superior cell survival in comparison with dissociated cell injection. Tissue Eng Part A 17: 2973–2980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kearns-Jonker M, Dai W, Gunthart M, Fuentes T, Yeh HY, et al. (2012) Genetically Engineered Mesenchymal Stem Cells Influence Gene Expression in Donor Cardiomyocytes and the Recipient Heart. J Stem Cell Res Ther S1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 74. Templin C, Zweigerdt R, Schwanke K, Olmer R, Ghadri JR, et al. (2012) Transplantation and tracking of human-induced pluripotent stem cells in a pig model of myocardial infarction: assessment of cell survival, engraftment, and distribution by hybrid single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography of sodium iodide symporter transgene expression. Circulation 126: 430–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.