Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014 Jul 24;53(38):10209–10212. doi: 10.1002/anie.201404579

Table 1.

Optimization of Reaction Conditions.[a]

graphic file with name nihms626761t1.jpg

Entry T, °C Time, h Solvent Cooxidant Ratio 2/1
1[b,c] 150 12 DMF AgOPiv <1/99
2[b,c] 150 12 o-Cl2C6H4 AgOPiv 1/2 (33%)[h]
3[b,c] 150 12 CF3CH2OH AgOPiv >99/1 (63%)[h]
4 60 12 CF3CH2OH AgOPiv >99/1 (65%)[h]
5[b] 25 12 CF3CH2OH AgOPiv 1/4 (16%)[h]
6 60 12 CF3CH2OH K2S2O8 <1/99
7[d] 60 2 CF3CH2OH PhI(OAc)2 1/1 (11%)[h]
8 60 16 CF3CH2OH Mn(OAc)2 5/1 (79%)[h]
9[e] 80 2 CF3CH2OH Mn(OAc)2 1/2 (63%)[h]
10[e,f] 80 12 CF3CH2OH Mn(OAc)2 <1/99
11[g] 80 18 CF3CH2OH O2 1/1 (50%)[h]
12[d] 80 2 CF3CH2OH Mn(OAc)2 10/1 (87%)[h]
[a]

Amide 0.1 mmol, solvent 0.7 mL. Conversions were determined by 1H NMR analysis.

[b]

Co(OAc)2 catalyst.

[c]

Cooxidant: 0.8 equiv.

[d]

Cooxidant: 1 equiv.

[e]

Cooxidant: 0.5 equiv.

[f]

Deoxygenated solvent.

[g]

Reaction vessel pressurized with O2.

[h]

NMR yield of 2 using 1,1,2-trichloroethane as internal standard in parentheses.