Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Med. 2014 Jun 23;67:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.022

Table 4.

CRC discussion, screening modality recommendation and compliance with CRC screening guidelines among telephone survey respondents

Characteristics N (%) N (%) up-to- date with CRC screening Univariate OR (95% CI) Multivariate * OR (95% CI)
CRC screening discussed
No 587 (25.7) 189 (27.3) Reference Reference
Yes 1,851 (74.3) 1,399 (73.8) 7.50 (5.67–9.92) 7.27 (5.48–9.63)
CRC discussion and screening modality recommendation
No screening discussion 587 (28.8) 189 (27.3) Reference Reference
CRC discussed, no recommendation 469 (23.7) 310 (65.6) 5.08 (3.50–7.38) 5.46 (3.61–8.27)
CRC discussed and recommendation given 1,106 (47.5) 893 (79.0) 10.02 (7.30–13.76) 10.85 (7.99–14.74)
After CRC discussion, a screening modality was recommended
No 469 (33.3) 310 (65.6) Reference Reference
Yes 1,106 (66.7) 893 (79.0) 1.97 (1.40–2.77) 2.11 (1.41–3.14)
Screening modality recommended
None 469 (33.6) 310 (65.6) Reference Reference
Fecal occult blood only 71 (5.1) 43 (63.4) 0.91 (0.42–1.94) 1.19 (0.53–2.68)
Sigmoidoscopy only 47 (2.7) 40 (89.3) 4.39 (1.63–11.80) 6.67 (1.43–31.09)
Colonoscopy only 940 (56.4) 773 (80.2) 2.12 (1.51–2.97) 2.15 (1.43–3.22)
Multiple tests ** 47 (2.4) 40 (86.0) 3.20 (1.36–7.56) 2.53 (1.05–6.13)
*

Adjusted for age, sex, race, education, income, marital status, health insurance, smoking status and having a regular healthcare provider; Telephone survey (n = 2,438; weighted population size = 38,646,812)

**

Multiple tests = recommendation of more than one colon cancer screening modality