Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2013 Oct 28;23(1):58–64. doi: 10.1080/1067828x.2012.735561

Table 4.

Standardized Hierarchical Regression Analyses for Alcohol-Related Consequences and Intentions to Drink

Predictors Alcohol-Related Consequences
Intentions to Drink
Model 1
Model 2
Model 1
Model 2
β SE β SE β SE β SE
Peer Variables
 Alcohol use .11 .06 .10 .06 .36*** .05 .31*** .05
 Offers to use .28*** .06 .28*** .06 .31*** .05 .29*** .05
Parent Variables
 Rules against use .01 .05 −.13** .04
 Family support .12* .05 .12** .04
R2 .13 .14 .37 .40
ΔR2 .11 .01 .30 .03
ΔF 24.09*** 2.67 86.72*** 10.64***

Note. N = 383. ΔR2 for each Model 1 represents variance explained after adjusting for age, gender, ethnic-racial group, academic performance, enrollment in school, living arrangement, and assignment to study arm. Rules against use (0 = no, 1 = yes); lower family support scores are better.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001